增量变换器用于地质聚合物混合料基于代理的逆向设计

Incremental Transformer for Surrogate-Based Inverse Design of Geopolymer Mixtures

精选理由

想用小样本数据做材料逆向设计?这篇用INCRT处理复杂物理约束,给出一套比单纯优化更靠谱的候选筛选方法。

AI 摘要

论文提出一种拓扑感知代理框架,利用增量变换器(INCRT)进行物理约束的逆向设计,应用于地质聚合物混合料设计。方法集成内在维度分析、混合变量设计空间表示、表格代理预测、INCRT流形合理化及约束逆优化。在飞灰和矿渣基地质聚合物混凝土混合物公开基准上,高维设计空间围绕少数有效混合体系组织。抗压强度需非线性表格代理,碳排放主要由组成决定且正则化线性模型即可恢复。三种策略比较显示:无约束优化可匹配目标强度但可能产生物理无效候选;仅物理约束不保证数据支撑;拓扑感知策略平衡目标符合度、碳减排、物理合理性和流形接近性。

原文 · arXiv cs.AI

Incremental Transformer for Surrogate-Based Inverse Design of Geopolymer Mixtures

Small-data inverse design is challenging in engineering informatics when observations are heterogeneous, mixed-type, and constrained by physical relations among design variables. This work proposes a topology-aware surrogate framework guided by an Incremental Transformer (INCRT) for physics-constrained inverse design, applied to geopolymer mixture design. The method integrates intrinsic-dimensionality analysis, mixed-variable design-space representation, tabular surrogate prediction, INCRT-based manifold rationalisation, and constrained inverse optimisation. Using a public benchmark of fly-ash and slag-based geopolymer concrete mixtures with compressive-strength and carbon-emission targets, the high-dimensional design space proves strongly redundant, organising around fewer effective mixture regimes. Compressive strength requires nonlinear tabular surrogates, while carbon emission is largely determined by composition and well recovered by regularised linear models. INCRT thus acts not as a replacement for tabular predictors but as a rationalisation layer providing prototype regimes and a manifold-support score for inverse design. Three strategies are compared: unconstrained surrogate optimisation, physics-constrained optimisation, and topology-aware physics-constrained optimisation. Unconstrained optimisation can match target strength but may yield physically invalid or off-manifold candidates; physics-only constraints do not always ensure data support. The topology-aware strategy yields candidates balancing target compliance, carbon reduction, physical admissibility, and proximity to the learned feasible manifold. The framework aims not to replace experimental validation but to support screening of credible candidate mixtures from small, mixed, physically constrained engineering datasets.