E3方法让AI Agent按任务复杂度动态分配资源,效率提升显著

Do AI Agents Know When a Task Is Simple? Toward Complexity-Aware Reasoning and Execution

精选理由

这篇论文解决了AI agent过度读取文件的问题,E3方法能自动判断任务简单就少干活,在MSE-Bench上省了85%成本,效果很实在。

AI 摘要

该论文提出E3(Estimate, Execute, Expand)框架,让LLM Agent先估计任务难度,再执行最小可行路径,仅在验证失败时扩展范围。在MSE-Bench基准(121次编辑任务)上,E3在保持100%成功率的同时,将成本降低85%,tokens减少91%,检查文件数减少92%,并比强适应性检索基线高出16%。在gpt-4o真实库编辑实验中,E3是同等成功率下最轻量最快的策略。

原文 · arXiv cs.AI

Do AI Agents Know When a Task Is Simple? Toward Complexity-Aware Reasoning and Execution

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate multi-step engineering and informatics workflows, yet they rarely ask how much effort a task actually requires. They often follow a maximum-context-first strategy--re-reading files and dependencies they have already seen--turning a one-line edit into a small code-base audit. We argue the missing capability is task-aware execution-scope estimation: judging a task's difficulty, the information it truly needs, and the shortest reliable path before committing budget. We formalize minimum-sufficient execution and the Agent Cognitive Redundancy Ratio (ACRR), and propose E3 (Estimate, Execute, Expand): the agent estimates an initial operating point, executes a minimum viable path, and expands scope only when verification fails. On MSE-Bench--a deterministic benchmark of 121 edits in a capability-controlled simulator--E3 matches the strongest baseline's 100% success while cutting cost by 85%, tokens by 91%, and inspected files by 92%, and further beats a strong adaptive retrieval baseline by 16%; the gains survive held-out instruction wording and essentially every cost weighting. A companion real-model harness (LLM-Case) corroborates the effect on a live gpt-4o agent editing a real open-source library, with every candidate patch graded by actually running the project's real pytest suite against a measured oracle: the over-reading is milder but real, and E3 is the leanest and fastest policy at comparable task success--its one shortfall a provider rate-limit, not a wrong edit. We frame this as a controlled probe of execution redundancy, not a measurement of any deployed agent, and position task-aware execution as a step toward engineering-grounded AI (EGAI)--agents whose effort is anchored in the engineering reality of the task. We release the framework and benchmark.