AgentProv Audits Agentic LLM APIs
AgentProv: Auditing Agentic LLM API Providers via Tool-use Policy Probes
AgentProv solves the critical problem of verifying if agentic LLM APIs actually use the models they claim, addressing trust issues in commercial AI services.
AgentProv fingerprints deployed models through their categorical tool-call distribution using an MMD permutation test. It achieves 100% detection rate on 630 evaluated checkpoint pairs for substituted models. The method maintains a 7% false-positive rate under system-prompt injection, significantly better than MET (67%) and RUT (53%). On third-party APIs, AgentProv's disagreements with MET align with token-count side-channel detection of provider-injected prompts.
AgentProv: Auditing Agentic LLM API Providers via Tool-use Policy Probes
Commercial LLM APIs advertise a specific foundation model, but the served backbone may be silently substituted, quantized, or wrapped, for example to save deployment costs. All existing audits decide backbone identity from the text-output channel, which is structurally fragile for agentic APIs because modern serving stacks (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Cloudflare Workers AI, LangGraph) discard text and expose only structured actions when the model calls a tool, and provider-injected system prompts can distort text distributions enough that text-channel tests falsely accuse honest providers of substituting the claimed model. We observe that recent agentic post-training internalizes tool-use directly into the weights, opening a new audit channel that the serving stack still exposes and that is largely invariant to deployment context. We introduce Agentic Provenance (AgentProv), the first action-based identity audit for agentic LLM APIs: AgentProv fingerprints a deployed model through its categorical tool-call distribution and decides identity via an MMD permutation test. AgentProv catches every substituted model (100% on 630 evaluated checkpoint pairs), while holding the false-positive rate under system-prompt injection at 7% (vs. 67% for MET and 53% for RUT). On third-party API endpoints, AgentProv's disagreements with MET are consistent with an independent token-count side-channel that detects provider-injected system prompts.