Primary sourceIT之家
View sourceEvent ·Multi-source
Claude Fable 5 六项行业指数第一,成本比 DeepSeek V4 Pro 高 100 倍
Artificial Analysis 新增 6 个行业指数测试,Claude Fable 5 在全部 8 项指标中排名第一。Claude Opus 4.8 六项第二,GPT-5.5 xhigh 拿下剩余两项第二。开放权重模型 GLM-5.2 在 5 个行业指数中领先,工程基准得 53 分。成本方面,Claude Fable 5 在战略与运营指数中每任务成本 3.48 美元,是 DeepSeek V4 Pro max(0.03 美元)的 116 倍,性能仅高 12 分。DeepSeek V4 Flash 成本低于 0.04 美元,得分处于中游。
Current read
想选行业AI模型?Claude Fable 5 碾压全场,但成本是 DeepSeek V4 Pro 的百倍,性能只多 12 分,性价比得掂量。
11 sources63° AI heatLast updated 2026/7/9 06:46:04
Evidence
11 sourcesRelated source 1Decoder
View sourceRelated source 2OpenAI
View sourceRelated source 3AI Will
View sourceRelated source 4SuperTechFans
View sourceRelated source 5Geek
View sourceRelated source 6lmarena.ai
View sourceRelated source 7The Rundown AI
View sourceRelated source 8小互
View sourceRelated source 9爱范儿
View sourceRelated source 10Simon Willison’s Weblog
View sourceConflict check
Dedup data only shows that these sources discuss the same event, not that they agree. There is no structured supporting or refuting evidence yet, so no conflict is inferred automatically.