Event ·Multi-source

AI实验室是否刻意优化“骑自行车的鹈鹕”?系统测试未发现证据

Dylan Castillo针对AI实验室是否专门训练模型生成“骑自行车的鹈鹕”进行了系统测试。他设计了8种动物×6种车辆共48个提示,每个提示在7个模型(GPT-5.6 Terra、Claude Sonnet 5、Gemini 3.5 Flash、Grok 4.5、Qwen3.7-Max、GLM-5.2、DeepSeek V4 Pro)上运行3次,并用GPT-5.6 Luna和Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite辅助评估。结果显示,没有任何模型在鹈鹕骑自行车场景上表现更好,GLM-5.2虽有微小正向偏差但统计不显著。结论是AI实验室并未系统性地优化这一特定组合。

Current read

别猜了,Dylan用48个提示跑了7个模型,结论是AI实验室没作弊,鹈鹕骑自行车并不比其他组合强。

3 sources63° AI heatLast updated 2026/7/22 23:01:00

Evidence

3 sources
Primary sourceSimon Willison’s Weblog
View source
Related source 1arXiv: DeepSeek
View source

Conflict check

Dedup data only shows that these sources discuss the same event, not that they agree. There is no structured supporting or refuting evidence yet, so no conflict is inferred automatically.