Primary sourceAI Will
View sourceEvent ·Multi-source
Fable 5.2 实测对比 Opus、Gemini、GPT、Kimi：10 组同提示词案例
Fable 5.2 发布后，用户把 Opus、Gemini、GPT、Kimi 放在同一条提示词下做了 10 组实测对比。结果显示没有一个模型全面胜出：有时 Fable 5.2 更快，有时更贵，也存在低价方案效果反而更好的情况。这类同提示词横向对比的价值在于把模型差异落到具体任务上，而不是只看跑分。对选型的开发者来说，结论是按任务类型和预算挑模型，而不是默认追新。
Current read
有人把 Fable 5.2 和 Opus、Gemini、GPT、Kimi 用同一批提示词跑了 10 组对比，结论很实在：新模型并非全面碾压，价格、速度、效果各有胜负。如果你正在为项目挑模型，这 10 组案例能帮你按任务和预算做选择。
11 sources41° AI heatLast updated 2026/11/11 06:49:18
Evidence
11 sourcesRelated source 1berryxia
View sourceRelated source 2Claude
View sourceRelated source 3Mike Krieger
View sourceRelated source 4rohanpaul_ai
View sourceRelated source 5Matt Shumer
View sourceRelated source 6lmarena.ai
View sourceRelated source 7Andrew Curran
View sourceRelated source 8Decoder
View sourceRelated source 9@atomic_chat_hq
View sourceRelated source 10Varun Mohan
View sourceConflict check
Dedup data only shows that these sources discuss the same event, not that they agree. There is no structured supporting or refuting evidence yet, so no conflict is inferred automatically.