Mitchell对比了Sol和Fable的实际体验，Sol默认更快更全面，Fable则在特定调试场景无敌，看谁更对你的需求。
Mitchell Hashimoto获得5.6/Sol早期访问约一个月，认为Sol更快、计划与判断能力与Fable相当，整体产出更好。他将Sol描述为有魅力、高效的同事，Fable则是天才但孤僻的专家。Fable在高度定向的调试、安全、性能任务上无对手，而Sol在其他所有方面更优或相当。
And the takeaway of course is to figure out the best way to leverage the strengths of both models. ...
And the takeaway of course is to figure out the best way to leverage the strengths of both models. The one thing I don’t see any of these early testers talking about is the guardrails. I hope they don’t screw up the experience the way Fable 5 does for deep technical work. Mitchell Hashimoto @mitchellh I had early access to 5.6/Sol for ~month. Sol is my default. It is faster, plans/judges just as good as Fable, and I think produces better overall work. I’ll reach for Fable still for highly targeted debug or performance work with clear reward functions. A cheeky way I describe Sol vs Fable to my friends is that Sol is a charismatic, efficient, talented coworker you’re jealous of. Fable is a genius recluse that is brilliant at its fixations but doesn’t go out, doesn’t date, and you don’t want to hang out with them much lol. Fable is undefeated at highly targeted debug/security/performance goals. It’s a sight to behold and I was never able to get Sol to push as hard in this category. I’ll keep using it for this. Sol is better or comparable at everything else, in my experience. Give it a shot, it’s hard to describe but it’s just more enjoyable to work with. (Disclaimer I have no financial ties to either lab, wasn’t paid for any of this.) 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 4 🔄 0 ❤️ 13 👀 2666 📊 4 ⚡