论文精选

基于黎曼法坐标的Levenberg-Marquardt方法的高阶几何更新

Higher-Order Geometric Updates for Levenberg-Marquardt Method via Riemann Normal Coordinates

精选理由

这篇论文提出RNC-LM,解决了LM方法在强曲率问题上的局限,用黎曼法坐标做高阶修正,在PINN和势能面拟合上又准又快。

AI 摘要

非线性最小二乘优化中,参数效应曲率是LM方法的主要非线性来源。标准LM的切线空间步长在参数坐标中直更新,而测地线加速度仅在无穷小步长时精确消除该曲率。本文提出RNC-LM,通过重参数化测地线方程扩展至任意阶修正,构建有限步更新并控制步长。在经典基准测试中,RNC-LM在弯曲谷和秩亏问题上提升了收敛性和鲁棒性。在反应扩散PINN失败模式基准上,相对L2误差降至1e-3量级并恢复物理解;在大规模机器学习势能面拟合任务中,相比标准LM实现了34倍加速。

原文 · arXiv cs.LG

Higher-Order Geometric Updates for Levenberg-Marquardt Method via Riemann Normal Coordinates

Nonlinear least-squares optimization is central to regression, physics-informed neural networks, and other machine-learning tasks. Such problems have a natural geometric interpretation, model predictions form a manifold in data space, while the chosen parameterization can introduce parameter-effects curvature that becomes a dominant source of nonlinearity. This exposes a limitation of the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) method, its tangent-space step is applied as a straight update in parameter coordinates. Geodesic acceleration gives a second-order correction, but its removal of parameter-effect curvature is exact only in the infinitesimal-step limit. We propose a Riemann-normal-coordinate Levenberg-Marquardt method (RNC-LM) to improve this consistency for finite optimization steps. By reformulating the geodesic equation, RNC-LM extends geodesic acceleration to arbitrary-order corrections and constructs finite-step updates with progressively higher reparameterization consistency. A line search along the resulting RNC curve controls the traveled distance while keeping the cost close to standard LM. The method eliminates the tangential component of residual acceleration order by order in a moving tangent frame, making the actual objective reduction more consistent with the linear model prediction of LM. On classical nonlinear least-squares benchmarks, RNC-LM improves convergence and robustness in curved valleys and rank-deficient problems. On a reaction-diffusion PINN failure-mode benchmark, it reduces the relative L2 error to the order of 1e-3 and recovers a physically meaningful solution. On a large-scale machine-learning potential-energy-surface fitting task, it achieves a 34-fold speedup over standard LM.