AI产品精选73°

OpenAI连续两次重置ChatGPT Work/Codex额度,回应四类用户反馈

OpenAI 掌管「RESET」的人 Tibo 连续触发两次 ChatGPT Work / Codex 额度重置 源自 GPT-5.6 Sol 和 ChatGPT Work / Codex 的重磅发...

精选理由

OpenAI刚发的GPT-5.6 Sol太火,但新ChatGPT Work和Codex有坑,Tibo亲自重置额度并认错,还列出了具体修复计划,对使用这两个产品的用户很有参考价值。

AI 摘要

OpenAI的Tibo在GPT-5.6 Sol和ChatGPT Work/Codex发布后连续两次触发额度重置。新版本暴露四类问题:高算力默认设置易耗尽额度且成本不透明;桌面端改版让聊天和项目入口难找;Codex用户感到被边缘化;多智能体工作流出现回归。今天已落地第一批修复,包括两次额度重置、修改默认模型选择器、修复插件提交问题。下周将把聊天和项目放回侧边栏,并让用量和重置时间更可见。

原文 · shao__meng

OpenAI 掌管「RESET」的人 Tibo 连续触发两次 ChatGPT Work / Codex 额度重置 源自 GPT-5.6 Sol 和 ChatGPT Work / Codex 的重磅发...

OpenAI 掌管「RESET」的人 Tibo 连续触发两次 ChatGPT Work / Codex 额度重置 源自 GPT-5.6 Sol 和 ChatGPT Work / Codex 的重磅发布,用户热情高涨,但这次新模型的消耗量、ChatGPT Work / Codex 的合并,虽然方向肯定正确,但也有很明显的匆忙上线的痕迹。 # Codex 团队已经看到的四类问题 1. 高算力默认太容易触发,成本不透明 最高算力档位太好选,却没有把「这会更快烧完额度」讲清楚。 本质是:默认值与激励设计偏激进,用户容易在不知情下消耗昂贵配额。 2. 桌面端改版过猛,熟悉路径被打断 一次大胆重组后,聊天、项目等常用入口变难找。 本质是:信息架构优先「新叙事」,牺牲了既有肌肉记忆。 3. 发布叙事让 Codex 用户感到被边缘化 对外主打 ChatGPT Work,部分 Codex 重度用户读出「Codex 会逐渐消失」的信号。 官方明确否认:Codex 会长期存在,且他们重视它。 本质是:产品整合叙事压过了产品线承诺,造成信任损伤。 4. 多智能体工作流回归 + 插件等体验毛刺 既有 multi-agent 流程出现回退,插件等也有 rough edges。 本质是:整合发布引入了功能回归,而不只是「新功能不完美」。 # 今天和下周会落地的「第一批修复」 今天要落地的 1. 两次用量重置:让用户能继续试,降低「额度被莫名烧光」的挫败感 2. 改默认值与模型选择器:不再把人推向不必要的高成本设置 3. 修插件提交相关问题:先处理一批明确的 rough edges 4. 改善产品中对 Codex 的呈现:修复「Codex 要没了」的感知 5. 清理最紧急的桌面端问题:先修最痛的导航/可用性回归 下周的「更大一批改进」 · 把 chats / projects 重新放回侧边栏,更熟悉、可自定义 · 用量与重置时间做得更可见 · 说清何时用 ChatGPT Work、何时用 Codex · 继续消化其余反馈 Tibo @thsottiaux Hello beautiful people! We have reset usage limits across Codex and ChatGPT Work. And another one will come later in the day. Rejoice. Now that I have your attention, a quick update on ChatGPT Work, Codex and all the updates we shared yesterday. We’ve spent the last 24 hours reading feedback, looking at usage patterns, and talking with many of you. The short version is that there is a *lot* of excitement for GPT 5.6 Sol, ChatGPT Work on mobile & web, but also that we didn't get everything quite right. - We made it too easy to use the highest-compute settings without making the impact on usage limits sufficiently clear. - We reorganized the desktop app in one bold move, making familiar things like chats and projects harder to find. - Our launch framing was focused on ChatGPT Work and to some of our Codex fans it made it feel like Codex was going away over time. Absolutely not our intention, we love Codex and it is here to stay. - And we introduced regressions for some existing multi-agent workflows, alongside a collection of rough edges in plugins and other parts of the experience. We’re landing a first set of improvements today. We’re resetting usage twice so people can keep experimenting, changing defaults and the model picker so they don’t push people toward unnecessarily expensive settings, fixing several plugin submission issues, improving how we represent Codex in the product, and cleaning up some of the most immediate desktop problems. A larger set of improvements will land next week. We’re bringing chats and projects back into the sidebar in a more familiar and customizable way, making usage and reset timing much more visible, clarifying when to use ChatGPT Work and when to use Codex, and addressing the many other smaller pieces of great feedback we've had. The ambition behind this launch hasn’t changed. We think bringing ChatGPT and Codex together into a workspace where people and agents can collaborate is a very important step forward. But an ambitious direction doesn’t excuse avoidable confusion or regressions in the first version. Please keep the feedback coming. We’re moving quickly, and you should see the experience already get better with a few updates today; and substantially better again next week. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 1 🔄 0 ❤️ 0 👀 388 📊 1 ⚡