Doximity Ask在独立测试中把GPT-5.6和Claude Fable 5都干翻了，说明医学领域专用模型才是王道。
Doximity Ask由Doximity开发，基于Fireworks平台训练。在Stanford Arise Lab的独立评估中，它超越GPT-5.6 Sol、Claude Fable 5、OpenEvidence等24个模型。该研究涉及12,747个专家评级，针对真实临床问题。结果表明专用临床模型在安全性上更优。
Generic AI models are not built for medicine. Doximity Ask, trained and served on Fireworks, outper...
Generic AI models are not built for medicine. Doximity Ask, trained and served on Fireworks, outperformed GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5, and OpenEvidence in a Stanford-Harvard clinical AI safety study. Specialized intelligence beats the generic version when safety matters. @doximity proved it. Doximity @doximity Finally: an independent, head-to-head test of clinical AI models. This week, Stanford's Arise Lab published one of the most comprehensive independent evaluations of clinical AI to date. The benchmark compared 24 frontier and clinical AI models, producing 12,747 expert rankings on their answers to real-world clinical questions. We were excited to see Doximity Ask outperform OpenEvidence, GPT-5.6, Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and other leading frontier AI models. The bigger story, though, is that clinical AI is finally getting the kind of rigorous, independent benchmarking it needs. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 0 🔄 0 ❤️ 1 👀 312 ⚡