可解释机器学习用于空气污染与呼吸健康预测:社会经济亚组分析

Interpretable Machine Learning for Air Pollution and Respiratory Health Prediction: A Socioeconomic Subgroup Analysis

精选理由

这篇论文用实打实的数据告诉你,PM2.5对呼吸健康影响有多大,而且不同收入国家差别明显,模型能解释比只看精度更重要。

AI 摘要

该研究使用可解释机器学习框架,基于国家层面每周数据预测呼吸疾病率(每10万人)和空气质量状态。比较了9种回归模型和9种分类模型,采用嵌套交叉验证评估性能。结果显示PM2.5浓度是呼吸疾病率的最强预测因子,线性模型在回归任务中表现最佳;去除PM2.5后,GDP per capita、降水和医疗保健可及性等变量影响力上升。亚组分析表明,中低收入国家中PM2.5对预测的贡献显著高于高收入国家。研究强调模型可解释性比单纯精度更能揭示气候-健康预测中的关键机制。

原文 · arXiv cs.LG

Interpretable Machine Learning for Air Pollution and Respiratory Health Prediction: A Socioeconomic Subgroup Analysis

Air pollution and climate-related stressors are increasingly important concerns for respiratory health, especially in settings with unequal environmental exposure and healthcare capacity. This study evaluates an interpretable machine learning framework for predicting respiratory disease rates and air-quality status using structured country-level weekly data. Two supervised learning tasks were considered: regression of respiratory disease rate per 100,000 population and binary classification of air-quality status. Nine regression models and nine classification models were compared using nested cross-validation. Model interpretation was conducted using SHAP values, and subgroup analysis was performed across income levels and geographic regions. The results showed that PM2.5 concentration was the dominant predictor of respiratory disease rate, with linear and regularized linear models achieving the strongest regression performance. For air-quality classification, models achieved high balanced accuracy when PM2.5 was included, but performance decreased substantially when PM2.5 was removed, indicating strong dependence on pollutant-related information. SHAP analysis showed that, without PM2.5, socioeconomic and meteorological variables such as GDP per capita, precipitation, and healthcare access became more influential. Subgroup analysis showed similar aggregate regression error across income groups, but PM2.5 contributed more strongly to predictions in lower-middle-income countries. These results show that model accuracy alone is not sufficient for climate-health prediction. Interpretable models can help identify dominant pollution-related signals, test whether results depend on key pollutant variables, and show whether prediction patterns differ across socioeconomic groups.