奖励结构塑造强化学习中情景探索与神经记忆的交互

Reward Structure Shapes the Interaction Between Episodic Exploration and Neural Memory in Reinforcement Learning

精选理由

这份论文把探索奖励和记忆架构放一起测,发现奖励结构不同,效果天差地别,做RL的值得看看。

AI 摘要

该研究通过受控实验,将探索奖励与多种神经记忆架构交叉,在三个环境(记忆内容的获取方式不同)中测量其相互作用。结果显示,相同的奖励信号会带来三种截然不同的交互模式:放大架构差异、将所有架构拉平到同一水平、或完全无效。研究者进一步用观测锚定奖励机形式化了奖励稀疏性,区分结构稀疏性与潜在稀疏性,证明探索与记忆是互补而非替代关系。

原文 · arXiv cs.LG

Reward Structure Shapes the Interaction Between Episodic Exploration and Neural Memory in Reinforcement Learning

In partially observable reinforcement learning, agents face a dual bottleneck: they must explore to encounter rewarding states and retain that experience in memory to optimize their policies. Exploration bonuses and memory architectures are traditionally evaluated in isolation, leaving their interaction unmeasured, and standard notions of sparse reward conflate temporal signal density with what the reward actually supervises. We present a controlled study crossing episodic exploration bonuses with diverse neural memory architectures across three environments that vary how the content of memory is acquired. An identical bonus signal yields three distinct interaction patterns: it amplifies architectural capacity differences where memory content must be actively discovered and retained unsupervised; equalizes architectures to a shared ceiling where the content, once sought out, is a single reward-supervised cue; and is null where the observation stream is purely scheduled. Controlled reward manipulations verify that these patterns track reward structure rather than density: a dense reward neutralizes a bonus only if it directly supervises the required latent memory, and a small avoidable penalty on exploratory actions (leaving the optimum unchanged) induces policy convergence to suboptimal stationary states, which either bonus resolves. We then formalize reward sparsity with observation-anchored reward machines, separating structural sparsity (an automaton reproduces the return without the task-required history) from potential sparsity (the one-step reward misprices local exploratory actions); the resulting vocabulary organizes the three regimes by the retention burden each task exposes. Together, these results show exploration and memory are complements, not substitutes: a bonus induces exposure, and only memory converts exposure into return.