Consilience:无需验证器的测试时扩展新框架
Consilience for Verifier-Free Test-Time Scaling
如果你做推理模型,这个框架能解决置信度评分在复杂任务上失效的问题,用时间不对称性挑出真正靠谱的答案。
论文指出基于置信度的无验证器测试时扩展(VF-TTS)方法在复杂任务上会崩溃,因为高置信度常表示探索失败。作者提出Consilience框架,通过评估推理中置信度的时间不对称性,惩罚初始高置信度并要求最终确定性。
在研究生级数学问题和自由形式代码生成实验中,Consilience优于现有基线。
Consilience for Verifier-Free Test-Time Scaling
Test-time scaling often uses an external verifier, such as compilers and test cases in coding or trained value functions in robotics applications, to obtain high-quality rollouts. Verifier-free test-time scaling (or VF-TTS) is gaining extensive attention as a mechanism to enhance Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning, primarily because we do not have access to such high-quality verifiers in many real-world applications. Among existing VF-TTS methods, confidence-based VF-TTS methods, which compute and rank rollouts solely by confidence, are particularly promising. Such methods introduce near-zero overhead for sample evaluation and require minimal access to internal model states, making the methods highly flexible across models and tasks. In this paper, we demonstrate a critical limitation of existing confidence-based VF-TTS methods by showing that such methods catastrophically break down on complex tasks. We observe a very interesting phenomenon: uniformly high confidence frequently indicates a failure to explore, favoring confidently wrong answers. To address this, our core insight is that robust cognitive search requires a specific confidence trajectory pattern: such methods perform exploratory branching at the beginning, as manifested by low initial confidence, and converge to a high final confidence solution. To implement this insight, we introduce consilience, a novel selection framework that explicitly evaluates the temporal asymmetry of confidence in reasoning. We operationalize this via a combinatorial metric that actively penalizes high initial confidence while strictly demanding final certainty. Extensive experiments covering both graduate-level mathematics problems and free-form code generation demonstrate that consilience effectively outperforms existing baselines, validating our novel perspective on completion confidence.
This report is categorized under AITOP's "Papers" desk. Key entities and technical topics under continuous tracking include Consilience, test-time scaling, reasoning models, confidence.
Source attribution: curated from arXiv cs.LG (@Lecheng Kong, Like Hui, Haitao Mao, Jun Huan).