AI模型精选72°

ChatGPT搜索引用变化分析

源:https://t.co/pBooyY04ye

精选理由

ChatGPT搜索策略变化,关注其引用来源的变化,了解AI搜索趋势。

AI 摘要

ChatGPT减少对Reddit的引用,转而使用更具体的搜索,如IBM官网。同时,其引用数据集也发生变化,如对帮助中心/文档的引用增加。这可能表明ChatGPT在搜索前开始选择信任的来源,使来源权威性比页面排名更重要。

原文 · AI Will

源:https://t.co/pBooyY04ye

源: x.com/jakezward/stat… Jake Ward @jakezward Reddit is disappearing from ChatGPT citations right now, but I honestly think everyone is focusing on the wrong part of the story: Reddit isn't what matters most here. Because something much bigger seems to have changed in how ChatGPT searches. 8 August: ChatGPT started citing Reddit less. 14 August: Basically stopped citing Reddit at all. But at almost exactly the same time, ChatGPT’s query fan-outs started changing too. It began using way more specific searches like: > site:ibm .com > ibm official pricing > ibm docs [feature] Which suggests ChatGPT is doing less: search the web > see what ranks > cite it And more: choose where to search > search those sites or brands > build the answer But Reddit isn't the only thing changing, another dataset found that it’s the entire citation mix: > Reddit: 15% → 0% > review sites/forums: 7% → 0% > smaller company sites: 66% → 32% While: > help centres/docs: 2% → 32% > established companies: 4% → 18% > app marketplaces: 2% → 17% This is the part I find most interesting. Is ChatGPT starting to decide which sources it trusts before it searches? Does that make the authority of the source more important than where an individual page ranks? And how long does any of this last? Because if AI search keeps proving one thing, it’s how quickly things change. Reddit looked incredibly important 2 weeks ago. In another 2 weeks, this could all look different again. x.com/forgebitz/stat… 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 0 🔄 0 ❤️ 0 👀 219 ⚡