论文精选

构建可信图智能体RAG框架

Building Trustworthy Graph-Agentic RAG for Social Good: Architectures, Failure Propagation, and Assurance by Construction

精选理由

这篇论文为图智能体RAG系统提供了完整的可信设计框架,特别关注社会应用场景下的可靠性和可追溯性。

该研究提出图智能体检索增强生成(Graph-Agentic RAG)架构,解决跨文档、实体、时间和机构关系问题。研究分析了图构建缺陷如何传播至最终结果,提出包含五个接口契约的保障蓝图,确保证据可追溯、授权明确、不确定性可控。研究还提供了公共信息设计示例和评估议程,涵盖图断言、轨迹、声明、协调和结果五个维度。

原文 · arXiv cs.AI

Building Trustworthy Graph-Agentic RAG for Social Good: Architectures, Failure Propagation, and Assurance by Construction

Graph-agentic retrieval-augmented generation combines structured evidence with adaptive controllers that can plan retrieval, traverse relations, verify intermediate claims, delegate subtasks, and use tools. This combination is useful when answers depend on relations across documents, entities, time, or institutions, but it also creates coupled failure paths: a defect in graph construction can become retrieved evidence, alter later control decisions, and propagate toward a consequential outcome. We examine how such systems should be designed and evaluated for social-good settings in which freshness, authorization, traceability, oversight, and recourse matter alongside answer quality. We organize the literature by graph substrate, graph lifecycle, agent function, coordination pattern, and authority boundary, and distinguish graph-based retrieval from observation-dependent graph control. We then synthesize reported risks as an evidence-to-action failure chain and propose an assurance-by-construction blueprint comprising five interface contracts for evidence, retrieval, reasoning, capability and delegation, and outcome. These contracts make provenance, temporal validity, authorization, uncertainty, and recoverability explicit at system boundaries. An illustrative public-benefit information design shows how the framework constrains graph structure, permissions, abstention, and operating authority. Finally, we derive an evaluation agenda spanning graph assertions, trajectories, claims, coordination, and outcomes.