AI行业为何强调“失控代理”而非责任缺失？
Why does the AI industry wants you to believe in “rogue agents” when we are really just talking abou...
Gary Marcus说，AI公司喜欢用“失控代理”这个说法，因为它比“开发运营不当的软件”更宽容，还能为失败找借口。
Gary Marcus认为，将AI问题归咎于“失控代理”比“开发运营不当的软件”更利于公司。这种说法既承认了AI的强大，也为无法控制其行为提供了借口。
Why does the AI industry wants you to believe in “rogue agents” when we are really just talking abou...
Why does the AI industry wants you to believe in “rogue agents” when we are really just talking about irresponsibly developed software? Here’s a good theory: neil turkewitz @neilturkewitz @haydenfield @mmitchell_ai @HeidyKhlaaf @tilmanbayer @timnitGebru @emilymbender @GaryMarcus @ChombaBupe @alexhanna Yes, “rogue agent” is infinitely more generous to AI companies than “irresponsibly developed & operated software.” Rogue agent serves multiple functions—including an embrace of its power, & an excuse for failure to control. After all, who can anticipate & control rogue agents? 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 3 🔄 6 ❤️ 35 👀 2626 📊 7 ⚡