Perplexity 团队回应：Teammates 为何领先同类智能体产品
Perplexity 的 Teammates 智能体产品被用户夸实际好用，CEO 亲自解释了三点设计原因，想了解智能体编排思路的可以看看。
Perplexity CEO Arav Srinivas 回应了用户对 Teammates 的好评，并给出 3 点原因：用代码高效运行智能体轨迹的 Harness、不强制使用非前沿模型的 Model-Neutral 设计，以及 Perplexity 搜索的准确性。用户 Julian Brooks 评价 Teammates 的 orchestrator 出色，不会给子智能体分配过大的昂贵提示词，管理简单。该推文在 X 上获得约 2344 次浏览和 12 个赞。
I’ve tried the other products in this category myself. Teammates are a notch above everything else. Glad to see that resonate with users. Simple reasons: (1) Harness (efficiently running agent traces largely in code), (2) Model-Neutral (not forcing you into a worse non-frontier model), (3) Quality of Perplexity’s search and accuracy. Julian Brooks @OutsourcedLogic Teammates are one of the only agent products to come out recently that are ACTUALLY useful. It all comes down to the orchestrator and I think they really nailed it. Doesn’t overly subscribe subagents, doesn’t give them massive, expensive prompts that confuse them, super easy to manage. Seriously becoming Perplexity Pilled recently.. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 6 🔄 0 ❤️ 12 👀 2344 📊 4 ⚡
