Ethan Mollick 用费米悖论提示词测试 Fable 5.2 与 Gemini Carbon
I asked Fable 5.2 & Gemini Carbon to "Solve th…
Ethan Mollick 让 Fable 5.2 和 Gemini Carbon 玩了一把费米悖论，答案没解出来但过程挺精彩。重点是那句提示词模板，你拿来测试任何推理模型都好用，想学结构化提问的别错过。
Ethan Mollick 在 X 上分享了一次实验：他用同一句提示词让 Fable 5.2 和 Gemini Carbon 解决费米悖论，要求两个模型罗列数据、检验假设、模拟批评者压力测试，并在无法得出确定结论时给出最可能的答案。
测试结果是两个模型都没有真正解决费米悖论，但 Mollick 表示它们产出了有意思的内容。这条推文附上了 Fable 5.
2 的完整回答链接，可供读者自行查看模型的具体推理过程。这次实验展示了一种结构化提示词的用法：把“给答案”改为“走完数据收集、假设检验、反驳压力测试的完整流程”，让模型在开放性科学问题上表现得更严谨。
I asked Fable 5.2 & Gemini Carbon to "Solve th…
I asked Fable 5.2 & Gemini Carbon to "Solve the Fermi Paradox. Marshal data, test hypotheses, pressure test them against critics, give me likely answers if you cant get a definite conclusion"
They did not solve it, but did do interesting stuff.
Fable 5.2 https://t.co/rNEZbQoHR9
This report is categorized under AITOP's "How-to" desk, focusing on US frontier AI labs and Silicon Valley technology leaders. Within our cross-regional analytical framework, it directly maps to AI developer toolchains, coding agents, and engineering workflows. Key entities and technical topics under continuous tracking include Fable 5.2, Gemini Carbon, 费米悖论, 提示词工程.
Source attribution: curated from Ethan Mollick (@emollick). Cross-source corroboration: 11 independent sources have covered this development (including AI Will, berryxia, Andrew Curran), confirming industry-wide signal strength.
