Gemini 4 Carbon 登顶 MathArena 数学榜，成本是 GPT-6.1 Sol 的 15 倍
Gemini 4 Carbon takes the MathArena crown but costs 15 times more than GPT-6.1 Sol
数学榜换老大了：Google 的 Gemini 4 Carbon 干掉了 GPT-6.1 Sol，Anthropic 的 Fable 5.2 也挤进前排。但它的价格是 GPT-6.1 Sol 的 15 倍，做数学推理应用的朋友选型前得算算账。
MathArena 数学基准榜单出现新变化：OpenAI 模型首次不再领先。Google 的 Gemini 4 Carbon 与 Anthropic 的 Fable 5.2 双双超越此前的榜首 GPT-6.1 Sol，其中 Gemini 4 Carbon 拿下 MathArena 第一名。
测试细节方面，Gemini 4 Carbon 在评测中忽略了时间限制，且几乎从不放弃任务，这种策略帮助它在数学题上取得更高得分。但代价明显：它的使用成本达到 GPT-6.1 Sol 的 15 倍，Fable 5.2 的价格同样不便宜。
对开发者而言，这意味着数学推理能力的头部位置被 Google 和 Anthropic 分走，但选型时需要在基准分数与token成本之间权衡——GPT-6.1 Sol 仍是性价比更高的选择。
Gemini 4 Carbon takes the MathArena crown but costs 15 times more than GPT-6.1 Sol
For the first time in a while, no OpenAI model leads the MathArena AI math benchmark. Google's Gemini 4 Carbon and Anthropic's Fable 5.2 have knocked GPT-6.1 Sol from the top, though both cost significantly more. Gemini ignored the time limit in testing and almost never gave up on a task. The article Gemini 4 Carbon takes the MathArena crown but costs 15 times more than GPT-6.1 Sol appeared first on The Decoder .
This report is categorized under AITOP's "Models" desk, focusing on US frontier AI labs and Silicon Valley technology leaders. Within our cross-regional analytical framework, it directly maps to US-China foundation model benchmarks and commercialization comparison and AI developer toolchains, coding agents, and engineering workflows. Key entities and technical topics under continuous tracking include Gemini 4 Carbon, GPT-6.1 Sol, Fable 5.2, MathArena.
Source attribution: curated from Decoder (@Matthias Bastian). Cross-source corroboration: 11 independent sources have covered this development (including Shubham Saboo, Logan Kilpatrick, 宝玉), confirming industry-wide signal strength.
