AI模型精选76°

Claude Opus 4.8 在 Agent Arena 与 GPT 5.5 并列第一

Claude Opus 4.8 debuts on Agent Arena tied #1 with GPT 5.5 (High) for Thinking & ranked #8 for Non-T...

精选理由

Agent Arena 用真实任务和因果推断评估智能体,比传统基准更贴近实际使用场景。做智能体开发或选型的团队,值得关注这个排行榜来对比模型的实际表现。

AI 摘要

Anthropic 的 Claude Opus 4.8 在 Agent Arena 排行榜上首次亮相,在 Thinking 模式下与 GPT 5.5 (High) 并列第一,但在 Non-Thinking 模式下仅排第八。相比前代 Opus 4.7,Opus 4.8 在开启思考时任务完成率更高,但可操控性略差,从 bash 错误中恢复更慢,且工具幻觉率上升。Agent Arena 基于 30 万+任务、200 万+工具调用和 4000 万行代码,通过因果追踪方法评估模型在真实世界智能体任务中的表现。该排行榜衡量任务成功、可操控性、错误恢复、用户反馈和工具幻觉五个信号。

原文 · lmarena.ai

Claude Opus 4.8 debuts on Agent Arena tied #1 with GPT 5.5 (High) for Thinking & ranked #8 for Non-T...

Claude Opus 4.8 debuts on Agent Arena tied #1 with GPT 5.5 (High) for Thinking & ranked #8 for Non-Thinking. The Opus 4.8 models show a small improvement over their predecessor 4.7 specifically when thinking is turned on. With thinking on, it completes more tasks than 4.7, but comes in slightly less steerable and slower to recover from bash errors. This variant also regresses on tool hallucination. With thinking off, it logs one of the highest tool hallucination rates on the leaderboard. Agent Arena ranks models on real-world agentic tasks using a causal tracing methodology. A model’s net improvement indicates how it compares to the average model. The thread breaks down how the two Opus 4.8 variants from @AnthropicAI scored across 5 signals, drawn from real tasks submitted by a global community of users. Arena.ai @arena Introducing Agent Arena: real-world agentic evals at scale. How do you evaluate agents doing actual work? We measure millions of live sessions where real users accomplish real tasks. On Arena, models now get web search, filesystem, and terminal tools to complete complex workflows: writing code, creating slide deck, researching the web, building apps, and analyzing documents. Every session produces rich signals. Users iterate with the agent turn-by-turn: approving, editing, correcting, praise or expressing frustration. The environment gives feedback too: shell errors, tool failures, recovery attempts, and more. Our leaderboard measures each model's agentic performance using causal inference across five signals: task success, steerability, error recovery, user praise vs. complaint, and tool hallucination. This leaderboard snapshot is built from 300K+ tasks, 2M+ tool calls, and 40M lines of code by agents. Top labs in Agent Arena: - #1 @OpenAI : GPT-5.5 (High) - #2 @AnthropicAI : Claude-Opus-4.7 (Thinking) - #3 @Zai_org : GLM-5.1 - #4 @GoogleDeepMind : Gemini-3.1-Pro - #5 @Kimi_Moonshot : Kimi-K2.6 More analysis in the thread, with the full technical blog below. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 4 🔄 1 ❤️ 52 👀 3960 📊 7 ⚡