Fable vs deep^2:同一任务耗时1小时40分花费350美元,deep^2仅20美元

Same here:

精选理由

Fable贵17倍但一次成功,deep^2便宜需调试

AI 摘要

Thorsten Ball在Day 3测试中,用Fable和deep^2实现跨CLI、Web服务器和另一服务器的功能。deep^2在去健身房前完成,花费20美元,但第一次运行未成功。Fable运行1小时40分钟,花费350美元,第一次尝试即成功。后续追问后Fable总花费升至457美元。两者都理解任务并构建了相同功能。

原文 · elvis

Same here:

Same here: Thorsten Ball @thorstenball Day 3 with Fable. Gave a huge prompt to implement a feature across CLI, web server, and another server to both Fable and deep^2 in Amp. deep^2 was done before I went to the gym. It stopped short. Sent another prompt. $20. Fable ran for 1hr40min and cost $350. Results: They both understood the assignment and built the same thing. Maybe that's due to my prompt. Fable's worked on first try. Well done. Deep's looks correct but didn't work on first try. $20 vs. $350. I'm sure I could get deep^2 to make it work and we'd end up at, what, $40? While Fable is now at $457 after I asked some follow-up questions. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 0 🔄 0 ❤️ 1 👀 984 ⚡

Fable vs deep^2:同一任务耗时1小时40分花费350美元,deep^2仅20美元 · AI 热点