USGuidelineConsultationModel providersDeployersChina outbound

Criticism of OpenAI and Anthropic seeking regulatory protection by slowing down AI research

批评OpenAI、Anthropic借放缓AI研发寻求监管保护
President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST)·Published 2026-09-14·Checked by 管理员 on 2026-09-14

The co-chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, David Sacks, wrote an article criticizing OpenAI and Anthropic for seeking regulatory protection by advocating for a slowdown in frontier AI research. He points out that these two companies have formed a duopoly in the field and questions whether their motives are truly altruistic. Sacks believes the market is already punishing models that are unpredictable or unauthorized, and slowing down development will give time for a more rational discussion on regulation.

What it means for you

• Obligations: AI companies, particularly those in the US, are under pressure to demonstrate responsible development and transparency regarding their AI models.
• Opportunities: Companies that prioritize safety and reliability may gain market trust and avoid regulatory penalties.
• Deadlines: The US government is seeking a more rational regulatory framework for AI, which may lead to new guidelines or policies in the near future.

What to do

ComplianceAI companies should be transparent about their development plans and the safety measures in place for their models.
ProductCompanies should prioritize building safe and reliable AI systems to avoid market penalties and maintain public trust.
ComplianceCompanies should monitor the evolving US regulatory landscape and prepare for potential new guidelines or policies on AI development.

Key dates

2026-09-14Published

Source documents

Coverage

Stories in the feed
Editorial summary, not legal advice; dates and status follow the original document. · Report a correction