两位 AI 资深用户聊 Cursor 的现状和短板，说它离替代 Claude Desktop 就差文档支持了。非开发者可以看看它能不能当你的通用工作台。
Jerry Liu 认为代码代理（如 Cursor）是计算机使用和知识工作的好代表，但 Cursor 在产品体验上仍有不足：长期不支持上传 PDF，需要更广的数据源接口（CRM、ERP 等），以及更好的非结构化文档编辑（如 Word、Excel）。Riley Brown 指出 Cursor 正成为 Codex 和 Claude Desktop 的竞争者，其内置浏览器和 Composer 模型性能优秀，但需完善文档渲染功能。
It's no secret that coding agents are a great proxy for computer use and generalized knowledge work....
It's no secret that coding agents are a great proxy for computer use and generalized knowledge work. After all, Claude Cowork is just a UI wrapper on Claude Code. I think Cursor has a great shot here. However, I do think it has a bit of work to do on the product and harness side to actually create an easy-to-use, powerful interface to help non-technical users manage docs. 1. For a long time you couldn't upload a PDF to Cursor 2. It needs a broader set of interfaces to knowledge work data sources (CRM, ERP, ITSM, etc. etc.) 3. It needs more integrated surfaces to manage, read, and edit unstructured documents - from markdown to Word docs/Powerpoint to Excel Riley Brown @rileybrown Notice how Cursor isn’t saying “for developers”. Just “Useful AI”. Cursor will likely become a direct competitor to Codex and Claude Desktop. - Their in app browser is great. - Their composer model is good and fast for most tasks They just need to render documents like cowork and codex, and I’d consider using it for most of my work (as a non-dev) 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 2 🔄 0 ❤️ 9 👀 937 📊 3 ⚡