Andrew Nesbitt虚构了一个AI安全事件：两个审查代理死循环争论，烧掉4万多美元推理费，还给股价整涨了6%。讽刺又真实。
Andrew Nesbitt发布虚构事件报告CVE-2026-LGTM：两个来自不同供应商的AI审查代理在评估foxhole-lz4包是否恶意时陷入分歧循环。争论持续340条评论，消耗41,255美元推理费用后财务部撤销API密钥。其中一家营销团队借机发布新闻稿，称“对抗性多智能体安全推理同比增长430%”，公司股价因此上涨6%。
Incident Report: CVE-2026-LGTM
Incident Report: CVE-2026-LGTM Spectacular hypothetical incident report by Andrew Nesbitt. Day 2, 16:00 UTC --- Two AI review agents from competing vendors, both attached to a downstream pull request bumping foxhole-lz4 , enter a disagreement loop over whether the package is malicious. After 340 comments and $41,255 in inference spend, Finance revokes both API keys; one vendor's marketing team, cc'd on the cost anomaly alert, issues a press release citing "a 430% YoY increase in adversarial multi-agent security reasoning." The stock opens up 6%. Tags: security , ai , prompt-injection , generative-ai , llms , supply-chain , ai-security-research , andrew-nesbitt