两个提示词版本:快速阅读 vs 深度理解论文

I have two versions of prompt: read-quick-dont-validate: <link to paper> Teach me this paper. Break...

精选理由

想用AI读论文又怕浅尝辄止?试试这两个具体写法,一个快速扫读,一个深度教学,亲测有效。

AI 摘要

用户Suhail分享了两个提示词版本:"read-quick-dont-validate"用于快速阅读论文,要求AI一步步拆解并一次性输出章节式解释;"validate-my-understanding-and-teach-me"则需提供5-10个参考链接,要求AI逐步教学并验证理解。第二个版本可耗时数周但学习更深入。两条提示词分别适用于不同学习场景。

原文 · Suhail

I have two versions of prompt: read-quick-dont-validate: <link to paper> Teach me this paper. Break...

I have two versions of prompt: read-quick-dont-validate: &lt;link to paper&gt; Teach me this paper. Break it down step by step. Write each step like a chapter in a book. Write it all out at once. For subtle or difficult concepts, break things down further and use examples. validate-my-understanding-and-teach-me: Resources: &lt;paste 5-10+ reference links you&#39;ve collected about the domain&gt; I would like you to teach me about &lt;modern day post-training for LLMs&gt;. Presume I understand &lt;LLM basics already&gt;. Build up my understanding from scratch step by step. Do not move to the next step without validating my current understanding. For subtle or difficult concepts, break things down further and use examples. The second one can go on for weeks but you learn in a deep way. 💬 1 🔄 1 ❤️ 6 👀 941 📊 4 ⚡