Gary Marcus怼Astra全能论，还用Claude分析Noam推文，看看AI圈怎么吵的
Gary Marcus在X上表示，OpenAI的Dean Ball称Astra能做任何事，但他怀疑Astra连数学都未必擅长。Ben Horne将Noam的推文输入Claude，Claude最后总结称，列表中的内容几乎都是构造或显式边界，只需展示巧妙对象即可验证。Claude还指出，所有这些成果都没有涉及构建新理论。Gary Marcus认为这些突破虽然惊人，但缺乏新理论值得思考。
Fascinating: OpenAI’s @deanwball is saying Astra can do anything, and it’s not even clear it can do ...
Fascinating: OpenAI’s @deanwball is saying Astra can do anything, and it’s not even clear it can do “anything” in math (let alone anything in more or open-ended, less formalizable domains). Ben Horne @benjamin_horne I dropped Noam’s tweet in Claude to see it’s reaction, and this was it’s final line (totally unprompted too, I did not ask it to neg): “The pattern worth noticing: almost everything here is a construction or an explicit bound — the kind of thing where a clever object, once exhibited, can be checked. Nothing on the list required building new theory.” To be clear, these breakthroughs are still amazing and cool. But I wonder what it means that there is still no new theory involved in these solutions. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 2 🔄 2 ❤️ 10 👀 4410 📊 4 ⚡