这是篇arXiv论文，讲的是让AI出护理方案时能被医生和家属质疑和修改的界面CoPlan，比那种给个结果就完事的系统靠谱。
CoPlan是一种面向人机协同护理规划的可争议界面，通过多智能体工作流生成候选干预措施及支持或质疑论点。人类护理规划者可以在最终计划生成前接受、拒绝、修改或添加论点，确保建议可被审查和修订。该系统在就地养老（aging-in-place）场景中进行了演示，支持自适应护理团队招募、基于角色的论证审查、最终护理计划生成及调度代理的后续跟进。该研究为可信赖的人机协同护理规划提供了保留人类能动性与临床问责制的设计框架。
CoPlan: A Trustworthy Co-Intelligence Interface for Care Planning through Role-Based Contestable Argument Graphs
AI-supported care planning can help clinicians, patients, caregivers, and care teams coordinate complex decisions across clinical, functional, psychosocial, and environmental needs. However, many AI systems present recommendations as fixed outputs, limiting stakeholders' ability to inspect, challenge, and revise plans when they conflict with clinical judgment, patient values, or real-world feasibility. We present CoPlan - a Co-Intelligent and Contestable Interface for Human-AI Care Planning. CoPlan uses a multi-agent workflow in which specialized AI agents generate candidate interventions and supporting or challenging arguments, while human care planners can accept, reject, modify, or add arguments before final plan generation. Through this design, CoPlan combines co-intelligence, in which humans and AI agents contribute complementary expertise, with contestability, where recommendations remain open to inspection, revision, and justification. We demonstrate CoPlan in an aging-in-place care planning scenario. The system supports adaptive care team recruitment, role-based argument review, final care plan generation, and practical follow-up through scheduling agents. This work contributes a contestable care planning interface and a design framing for trustworthy human-AI care planning that preserves human agency and clinical accountability.