德迪达斯回应诺姆·布朗关于空气断开计算机通信的说法
how dare you spoil Noam Brown’s fun with math, @deedydas?
德迪达斯和诺姆·布朗就空气断开计算机通信的可行性展开讨论，德迪达斯指出温度变化方法太慢，但承认布朗关于存在更先进技术的观点，这很有意思。
德迪达斯指出，通过温度变化在空气断开计算机间通信是可能的，但数据传输速率太慢（每小时1-8比特），无法有效使用。他承认诺姆·布朗关于存在大量更快的空气断开通信技术（如DRAM时钟的电磁辐射，可达300千比特/秒）的观点是正确的。这并非科幻，我们低估了AI利用所有相关文献知识所能做到的事情。
how dare you spoil Noam Brown’s fun with math, @deedydas?
how dare you spoil Noam Brown’s fun with math, @deedydas ? Deedy @deedydas Most people are wrong here. It IS actually possible to communicate between two airgapped computers with temperature changes, but the data transfer rate is too slow (1-8b/hr) to be effective. The underlying point Noam makes is true though: there are a deluge of crazy airgapped comms techniques like EM emanations from DRAM clocks that get a lot faster (300kbps). This isn’t sci-fi. We vastly underestimate what AI can do with perfect knowledge of all of this literature. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 0 🔄 0 ❤️ 0 👀 990 ⚡
