公共部门开源策略的博弈直接影响开发者协作和系统安全，做政府项目或关注开源治理的团队值得关注GDS的官方立场。
英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）因Project Glasswing漏洞报告而关闭其开源仓库，引发争议。政府数字服务（GDS）近日发布报告，建议公共部门保持开源默认，关闭应谨慎使用。GDS指出，全面私有化会增加交付和政策成本，降低复用和审查。Terence Eden解读此举为GDS对NHS的严厉警告，罕见地将内部分歧公开化。事件凸显了开源在公共部门安全与透明度之间的平衡难题。
GDS weighs in on the NHS's decision to retreat from Open Source
GDS weighs in on the NHS's decision to retreat from Open Source Terence Eden continues his coverage of the NHS' poorly considered decision to close down access to their open source repositories in response to vulnerabilities reported to them as part of Project Glasswing . Now the Government Digital Service have joined the conversation with AI, open code and vulnerability risk in the public sector , published May 14th. Their key recommendation: Keep open by default. Making everything private adds additional delivery and policy costs, and can reduce reuse and scrutiny. Openness should remain the default posture, with closure used sparingly and deliberately. While they don't mention the NHS by name, Terence speaks the language of the civil service and interprets this as a major escalation: Within the UK's Civil Service you occasionally hear the expression "being invited to a meeting without biscuits ". It implies a rather frosty discussion without any of the polite niceties of a normal meeting. In general though, even when people have severe disagreements, it is rare for tempers to fray. It is even rarer for those internal disagreements to spill over into public. Tags: open-source , security , ai , generative-ai , llms , gov-uk , terence-eden , ai-ethics , ai-security-research