Explore how agents compare across Agent Arena at: https://t.co/sE9q4FSYAt
想在同一个地方对比各家智能体水平的可以去看看 arena.ai 这个排行榜
LMArena 团队推出了 Agent Arena 智能体对比排行榜，网址为 arena.ai/leaderboard/agents。该页面汇总了不同智能体在同一 arena 环境下的表现对比。用户可以在排行榜中查看各智能体的排名情况。
Explore how agents compare across Agent Arena at: https://t.co/sE9q4FSYAt
Explore how agents compare across Agent Arena at: arena.ai/leaderboard/ag… 💬 0 🔄 0 ❤️ 0 👀 1065 ⚡
LMArena 的 Agent Arena 榜单上新了，能看到各智能体模型在不同任务间的取舍对比，选模型前可以先去比一比。
LMArena 搞了个 Agent Arena 排行榜，能看到各家智能体模型的排名，做 Agent 选型的可以对照着看。
For hour-long agent workloads, the cheapest model is not automatically the right one: Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher but costs twice as much per hour as Gemini 4 Carbon. Teams running long-horizon agents can use these per-hour cost and time figures to match model choice to budget and quality needs. The 55-minute spread among frontier models also suggests task duration, not just accuracy, should enter model selection criteria.
Agent Arena 拆了成本维度看模型：贵任务上 OpenAI 和 Anthropic 不再通吃，Gemini 4 Argon 和小米 MiMo 顶上，选型前值得对号入座。
Agent Arena 拿 5 家实验室的旗舰模型跑了长任务对比，Claude Opus 5.5 能连续干近 2 小时，Kimi 最快但也最短，差距挺直观。
