Theo 公布 T3 Code 用量数据：Claude Opus 5.5 占比远超 Codex
来自：https://t.co/ZnUYyAWRjM
Theo 晒出了自家工具的真实调用数据，Claude Opus 5.5 把 Codex 甩开一大截。这不是厂商自吹的榜单，是开发者真金白银投出来的选择，纠结编程模型选哪个的可以看看。
开发者 Theo（t3.gg）在 X 上分享了一张 T3 Code 平台的模型用量统计图，展示了 Codex 与 Claude 两条产品线的使用占比随时间的变化。他表示 Opus 5.5 的领先程度难以用语言形容，称自己从未见过类似的用量格局。
这条数据来自一个真实开发者工具的实际调用记录，而非厂商自报的基准测试，因此能直接反映开发者付费时选择的模型。Theo 的 T3 生态以 CLI 工具和前端开发者社区著称，其用户构成偏重度编程场景。
这类第三方平台用量数据常被用来交叉验证各家编程模型的实际市场份额，与 Anthropic、OpenAI 官方发布的使用统计形成互补。对关注编程助手选型的开发者来说，真实付费用量是比榜单分数更直接的参考。
来自：https://t.co/ZnUYyAWRjM
来自： x.com/theo/status/21… Theo - t3.gg @theo The complete and utter domination of Opus 5.5 is hard to put into words. I charted out the split of Codex vs Claude in T3 Code over time. Never seen anything like this before. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet
This report is categorized under AITOP's "Industry" desk, focusing on US frontier AI labs and Silicon Valley technology leaders. Within our cross-regional analytical framework, it directly maps to US-China foundation model benchmarks and commercialization comparison and AI developer toolchains, coding agents, and engineering workflows. Key entities and technical topics under continuous tracking include Claude, Opus 5.5, Codex, 编程助手.
Source attribution: curated from AI Will (@FinanceYF5). Cross-source corroboration: 11 independent sources have covered this development (including TestingCatalog, kimmonismus, Gergely Orosz), confirming industry-wide signal strength.
