Policy desk

Companies offering AI-generated content or products in Indonesia will need to build labelling capability into their outputs once the rule takes effect.

Companies must comply with EU's agentic AI application guidelines

Companies must comply with Hanoi's upcoming local AI regulations

Medical AI product providers must prepare for upcoming FDA regulatory requirements

Requires AI companies to reassess whether their models meet the updated 'frontier model' definition

Hong Kong companies will have opportunities to participate in AI research and industry collaboration projects with Austria

Provides a unified regulatory framework for AI companies operating in ASEAN

AI-assisted works will receive partial copyright protection, with only human-creative portions legally protected

Obligations: Data center operators must increase community participation in project approvals and cannot use confidentiality agreements. They must also comply with stricter environmental and energy efficiency standards. • Opportunities: Data centers investing in clean energy may receive priority for grid access. • Deadlines: The framework includes immediate administrative measures and proposed legislation for the 2027 state legislature.

Companies must ensure that the outputs from their AI systems are reviewed manually to comply with the government's suggestion. • Companies can leverage AI for efficiency improvements but must establish a manual review process. • Companies need to develop internal processes to address this suggestion.

Obligations: EU member states and AI developers may face increased scrutiny and potential new regulations to ensure AI development is slowed and its impacts are properly assessed.

Obligations: US AI companies may face increased scrutiny and potential regulatory constraints on their development speed.

Obligations: EU companies may need to adapt to new data regulations and frameworks being discussed, which could impose new compliance requirements.

Companies in Indonesia are required to participate or invest in national AI digital infrastructure projects to align with national strategic needs

Obligations: Leading AI companies such as Anthropic must grant independent assessors access to internal systems and risk teams and accept their findings.

Obligations: Companies operating in South Korea must comply with the government's directive to accelerate AI research and applications, while strengthening risk prevention measures for deepfakes, cyberattacks, and privacy. • Opportunities: South Korea's continued push for AI development presents opportunities for companies to participate in AI research, development, and application projects, especially in the semiconductor and hardware sectors. • Deadlines: The government plans to soon announce the next phase of its autonomous AI foundational model plan, creating a timeline for companies to prepare for potential new regulations or funding opportunities.

EU member states will form an alliance to ensure AI supply chain security, increasing compliance costs and collaboration opportunities.

OpenAI will adjust its R&D strategy to prioritize safety assessments, potentially slowing down the iteration of frontier technologies.

Obligations: Frontier AI developers must comply with consistent safety requirements under a federal framework and undergo independent audits. • Opportunities: Establishing unified safety standards and collaborative frameworks can enhance the safety of AI development and boost industry confidence. • Deadlines: The call for immediate action is made, but specific regulations and frameworks have not yet been issued.

Obligations: Companies developing AI must comply with proposed regulatory guardrails to mitigate risks.

Companies must master their proprietary tacit knowledge to build continuous learning loops and reduce reliance on single model vendors.

Obligations: AI companies must open their systems to third-party evaluators for safety audits and model alignment assessments, increasing compliance costs and operational complexity.

Companies must ensure their AI research aligns with the principles of human control and benefit for humanity, avoiding pursuits of meaningless or harmful superintelligence. • Companies should retain control over their unique knowledge and build autonomous continuous learning loops, not becoming dependent on any single model provider. • Microsoft will publish a 'Code of Conduct' for public consultation, providing clear guidance for the industry.

Obligations: AI data center operators may be subject to new environmental health regulations if the plan is adopted, requiring compliance with stricter air quality standards. • Opportunities: Companies investing in AI data centers in the US could gain from a streamlined regulatory process if the plan is implemented. • Deadlines: The plan's adoption hinges on the president's decision, with no specific timeline mentioned in the report.

Promote the large-scale application of intelligent terminal technologies

Require companies to comply with AI governance standards

Enhance the development level of computing power facilities

Requires smart glasses and similar devices to comply with stricter regulations in public places.

Obligations: Developers of frontier AI models must submit their models for a 60-day security assessment 60 days before release, otherwise they may face removal from the market. • Opportunities: Pre-release assessments can reduce security risks for models post-release and enhance public trust. • Deadlines: The policy requires the publication of safety review guidelines by August 31st, but the deadline has passed and the guidelines have not been made public.