ChinaLawProposed商务部、科技部 · 2026-10-19
Models exceeding 2T parameters or 10^26 FLOPS training compute will require export approval, and public open-source releases could be restricted — release strategies must be re-evaluated
ChinaLawProposed商务部 · 2026-10-18
Transfers of AI technology, models or related technical materials abroad (including to ASEAN) will require prior export licences, raising deal timelines and compliance costs
ChinaLawProposed2026-10-16
Export of model weights, source code, and training methods above the 10^26 FLOPs or 2 trillion parameter thresholds will require approval before release, delaying or blocking cross-border collaborations
ChinaLawProposed商务部 · 2026-10-16
Cross-border export or transfer of AI, biopharma or solar technology will require approval, so companies must plan licensing ahead
ChinaLawProposed2026-10-16
Chinese companies transferring AI models, algorithms or related technology abroad will face new export licensing requirements.
USLawProposedNew York City Council · 2026-10-02
Obligation: AI model providers must obtain third-party validation before deployment in NYC
USLawProposed2026-09-28
AI companies must deploy independent auditors who directly report to the new regulatory agency
GlobalLawProposed2026-09-25
AI model providers must implement stricter security measures to prevent agents from bypassing security barriers
USLawProposed圣马特奥县监事会 · 2026-09-18
Companies must provide equivalent employment or pay severance/training fees for employees whose jobs are replaced by robots.
USLawProposedCalifornia State Government · 2026-09-18
Obligations : Frontier AI labs must consider and implement safety mechanisms like a 'kill switch', and must have external monitoring and mandatory safety plans. • Opportunities : Provides clear regulatory direction for AI companies in California, helping to stabilize the market and facilitate long-term development. • Deadlines : The expert panel must submit recommendations within two months, with subsequent potential legislative processes.
EULawProposedEuropean Commission · 2026-09-18
Companies need to assess potential tax obligations for their automation projects.
EULawProposedEuropean Commission · 2026-09-17
Obligations: Social media platforms must comply with age restrictions, implement parental control modes for 13-15 year olds, and build in safety features like usage time limits. • Opportunities: Platforms can develop age-appropriate services and tools for parents, potentially expanding their user base within a regulated framework. • Deadlines: The legislation is currently in the drafting stage, with no specific enforcement date mentioned, but it is expected to enter the legislative process and be enacted.
USLawProposedUnited States Senate · 2026-09-15
Obligations: AI companies must provide evidence of risk prevention measures and allow government audits, increasing compliance costs and operational scrutiny.
IndonesiaLawProposedDPR (Indonesian Parliament) · 2026-09-11
Obligations: Companies operating AI data centers in Indonesia may be required to contribute to rising electricity tariff costs, potentially increasing operational expenses.
USLawProposedOpenAI · 2026-09-10
Obligations: US AI developers and providers must comply with mandatory national AI safety regulations and state-level AI laws, including independent third-party assessments and event reporting. • Opportunities: Companies that proactively adopt and comply with emerging AI safety standards may gain a competitive advantage and build public trust. • Deadlines: US Congress must act before its December recess to pass federal AI safety legislation, while companies must comply with existing state-level AI regulations.
EULawProposedEuropean Commission · 2026-09-08
The UK bans the development of superintelligent AI that could threaten human survival.
Editorial summary, not legal advice; dates and status follow the original document.