DeepSeek 新出的 V4.1-Flash-1017 是开源的,DeepSWE 1.1 跑分 77%,把 GPT-5.6 Sol 和 Opus 5 都比下去了,价格还便宜。
Latest
DeepSeek 周末更新的 V4.1-Flash-1017,性能更强还降价,搜索直接做成 API,5 元一千次,Agent 开发者可以马上试试。
DeepSeek 周末悄悄更新了 V4.1 Flash 1017,主打一句描述就能生成完整游戏或 3D 项目,做独立开发 or 玩编程的可以试试。
V4.1 Flash 1017 更新了,用自反馈 RL 让模型能从零做出完整游戏和 3D 项目,搜索功能被网友点赞。
DeepSeek 给 V4.1-Flash 做了次小更新,推理、编程、看图都变强,跑任务还更快更省 token,开源党可以关注下。
DeepSeek 的 V4.1 Flash 换了新版本号 1017,网页和 API 都自动切过去了,不用重新配置就能用上。
有博主晒 DeepSeek V4.1 跑多视角智能体的效果,说分歧视角输出很有意思,想看 V4.1 实际表现可以瞄一眼。
有人拿没官宣的 DeepSeek V4.1F-1017 做前端,5 分钟出活,还敢说比 Opus 强,看看截图自己判断。
有人发现 DeepSeek 这两个版本号可能其实是同一个模型,用 DeepSeek 的朋友可以看看自己的 API 版本对应关系。
DeepSeek 的 flash 模型指纹变了,疑似悄悄上了 V4.1-Flash-1017,有人说变聪明也更简洁了,可以自己试试对比。
有人实测了 Meta 新开源的 Muse Spark Open,结论是打不过 DeepSeek-v4.1-flash,还特能幻觉,想本地部署的先看看再决定。
Meta 放了个 816B 的开源权重模型 Muse Spark Open,美国开源第一,1M 上下文还能塞进两台 Mac Studio 自托管,不过跑智能体任务不如 GLM-5.3。
微软自研基模 MAI-Base-2 训完了,2.8T 总参数,算力效率是 DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Base 的 4~12 倍,还放出了训练细节。
NVIDIA 新一代 Vera Rubin NVL72 的跑分出来了,跑 DeepSeek V4 Pro 每兆瓦吞吐量是上一代的 5.7 倍,还刷出 906 tok/s 的单用户最快速度。
Meta 开源了 816B 的 Muse Spark Open,主打 1M 上下文和 Agent 任务,作者还算清了要跑起来得 700GB 显存,看看你的卡够不够。
小米 MiMo V2.6 Pro 超过 DeepSeek 登上 Agent Arena 开源第一,单任务才 $0.11,做智能体的可以看看这份榜单。
微软自家基座模型 MAI-Base-2 训完了,号称算力效率是 DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Base 的 4-12 倍,还顺手把省下的算力拿去训更大的模型。
微软 AI 的 Mustafa Suleyman 说他们用少 12 倍的算力就在代码评测上追平了 DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Base,不过细节还没发,先看看数据再说。
Speed, not raw accuracy, is the headline here: a 55% reduction in total task time against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash suggests latency-sensitive agent pipelines are where this model fits best. Developers building Deep Agents workflows in Python can test it directly through ChatNVIDIA with open weights, making self-hosting or cost comparison against closed APIs straightforward.
有人实测 DeepSeek 服务恢复后的新模型,速度 180 t/s,表现接近 Claude,可能是 4.1 Pro,想去试的可以看看。
Serving efficiency, not raw scale, is where V4.1 Flash wins: it delivers 1.3x to 6.2x the throughput per MW of V4 Pro 0813 across Blackwell hardware while scoring higher on intelligence. Teams running agentic coding workloads can use the AA-AgentPerf data to pick hardware — B300 nodes stay within about 20% of rack-scale GB300 NVL72, so single 8-GPU nodes are viable for this model. As an open-weights release from DeepSeek, it widens cheap self-hosting options for Southeast Asian inference providers competing with rented frontier APIs.
The MI355X's 288GB of HBM3E per GPU gives it an edge on very large models like the 1.6T-parameter DeepSeek V4 Pro, but serving-stack maturity on ROCm remains the bottleneck at higher loads. Teams evaluating accelerator purchases for agentic inference can now compare AMD and NVIDIA on realistic coding-agent workloads rather than synthetic throughput numbers. All results run on ROCm nightly builds of vLLM and SGLang, so scores should improve as the software stack matures.
有人发现 DeepSeek V4.1 给自己打分挺高,给同样是自己扮演的子智能体打分却低不少,这个自评偏差挺有意思。
An open-weights model beating closed leaders like Eleven v4 on pronunciation while costing a fifth of the price signals real pressure on commercial TTS pricing. Builders producing audiobooks, dubbed content or multi-speaker agents can self-host the weights from Hugging Face or call the API, with 83-language support covering major Southeast Asian languages. The Elo gain of 101 points over Fish Audio's own S2.1 Pro shows the jump is internal as well as competitive.
ARC Prize 实测了 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash,ARC-AGI-3 跑出 3.3%,成本不到 1000 美元,目前性价比最好的一份成绩单。
一个叫 CodeVideo Model 的开源项目,做的是自动生成代码演示视频,项目页和教程都放出来了,做开发教程内容的可以看看。
V4.1 和 Sol 6.1 这轮表现都很能打,尤其 Sol 6.1 出乎意料,还顺带聊了 Haiku 和 Fable 5.5 的定位。
The benchmark penalises behaviours conventional evals ignore, such as oversized diffs, out-of-scope file edits and unhelpful tests, so its ranking offers a different picture of coding ability than SWE-style test suites. Even the best model fails over 40% of tasks, meaning maintainer cleanup is still unavoidable. Teams choosing models by cost-performance should note GPT-6.1 Sol matching Claude Fable 5.1 at under a tenth of the per-task price.
The benchmark's merge-focused grading penalises the messy diffs and unhelpful tests that cheaper evaluations ignore, so leaderboard gaps here reflect real maintainer acceptance rather than raw test-passing. Leading models still fail over 40% of tasks, and nine tasks went unsolved by every model evaluated. Teams choosing coding agents can weigh GPT-6.1 Sol's 49% score at US$0.81 per task against Claude Opus 5.5's 52% at far higher cost, with open-weights options like MiMo-V2.6-Pro at 45% close behind.
LMArena 给出实测数据:Kimi K3 和 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 用不到一成的成本追平了 Claude Fable 5,做 agent 选型前可以看看这份榜单。
Meta 六周内又发了新模型,智能指数涨到 56,代理类任务进步明显,比 Claude 便宜但比 GPT-6 贵,做 agent 的可以看看。
This approach solves a critical bottleneck in long-context AI serving by enabling more efficient memory usage while maintaining high throughput. The technology allows models to handle significantly larger contexts without hitting memory limits, which directly impacts real-world applications requiring extensive context windows. Developers working with large language models should consider this optimization technique to improve performance in production environments.
Leaderboard rank alone overstates the win: the cheaper Alibaba Qwen model actually beats HeyGen on pronunciation robustness, and Eleven v4 is nearly twice as fast, so the top spot rests on voice quality in assistant-style use cases. Teams building voice agents in US and UK English can use the Elo splits by category, plus the price and speed data, to pick a TTS vendor. Alibaba's strong showing also signals competitive Chinese TTS at lower cost.
StoreBench introduces a dynamic, production-grade environment that reveals significant gaps between current LLM capabilities and human performance in e-commerce operations. The benchmark's realistic challenges - including supplier failures and market shocks - provide a more rigorous test than static evaluations. Researchers and developers can access five training tasks and sample trajectories to improve agent performance in complex, time-sensitive commercial scenarios.
This approach offers a lightweight way to update models without full retraining, potentially reducing costs for personalized AI applications. Developers working with large language models could implement this technique for efficient knowledge updates, especially useful for applications requiring frequent factual updates or user-specific customization.
The takeaway is that Anthropic is now competing on price, not just capability, in the small-model tier where Chinese labs have dominated. Builders choosing a cheap workhorse model for high-volume tasks can add Haiku 5.5 to a shortlist alongside DeepSeek-V4.1 flash and GLM 5.3 flash and re-run their own workloads to compare latency and cost. Pricing and availability for ASEAN API users should be checked against local provider rates.
SWA bounded replay shows how KV-cache reuse for agent loops can be engineered around sliding-window attention, a pattern many teams will copy as agent traffic grows. Engineers running agent stacks on vLLM can apply it to reduce TTFT under high concurrency. The writeup also signals that DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash inference performance is being actively tuned by the community rather than relying on the lab alone.
Sparse agent memory changes the economics of long-context agent runs, since cache footprint rather than raw context length becomes the cost driver. Developers running multi-step agent pipelines can weigh Flash's cheaper, lighter memory against the extra per-token compute it needs. At US$0.27 versus US$0.67, it also undercuts DeepSeek's own V4-Pro on price while scoring higher on the AA Index.