arXiv 上一篇论文,讲 KV 缓存淘汰怎么用迭代反馈自我纠错,在 LongBench 上比 LAQ 强,做长上下文推理优化可以看看。
Latest
一家团队把单细胞预测、解释和证据更新做进一个智能体框架,SciPlex3 上 AUPRC 高出基线 63.3%,token 还省了 99%,做生物信息的朋友可以看看。
这篇论文解释了为什么更聪明的 AI 有时反而帮倒忙:人会重复计算重叠证据。还用 ChatBench 数据拆出了两种损失各占多少,量化很扎实。
删除数据后怎么证明真的删干净了?这篇论文给 LLM 遗忘加了第四个评估维度,还给出了能套在任何方法上的两阶段方案。
城市规划也能用生成式模型了,输入一句话就能画出高密度开发方案的土地利用图,还带卫星图对照,做城市场景实验的可以看看。
研究发现医疗AI的风险证书防得住错误频率防不住极端大错,胎儿头围测量里一张图就翻车,改用解剖学范围约束花0.4个覆盖点就能把最坏误差压到11毫米级。
一篇处理偏好漂移的 bandit 新算法,核心是只遗忘出错的方向,比滑动窗口这类一刀切方法高 3 到 10 分,还能直接套在任何 API 模型上。
一篇 arXiv 观点论文,指出 RLHF 和 DPO 默认要集中数据的设计在医疗、法律等场景根本走不通,还给出了分布式对齐的技术路线。
训练机器人策略想挑最好的 checkpoint 又不想真机一遍遍试,这篇 arXiv 论文给出的 RACE 指标用成功轨迹就能校准打分,实测排名和部署成功率对得上。
The key insight is that framework design, not model training, drives most of the zero-shot gain: reliable tool feedback and consistent interfaces lifted the same model over 16x on RoboDojo. The five-layer stack plus six reliability rules (snapshot binding, queue flush, pose-error reporting) is a practical blueprint for anyone building real-robot or simulation agents. Simulation and real-machine interaction logs can be combined for later training, and the code is open-source on Hugging Face.
测了六个主流模型谁能模仿你的文风,结果 Gemini 3 Pro 分数最高,其实是靠大段抄原文,得辨别真假模仿。
The structural-guided pretraining approach shows how language-model techniques transfer to molecular biology, and the model's open-source release lets bioinformatics teams plug its features into existing 3D structure prediction pipelines. Researchers in drug discovery and RNA functional genomics can use it for tasks like splice site prediction without task-specific training. It is also the 16th USTC first-author paper in Nature, Science or Cell so far in 2026, underscoring the pace of Chinese fundamental research.
Anthropic 用 Claude 从 150 亿条序列里找出 96 条链组成的 Vault 结构,3 天纯化缩到 90 分钟,还写了 AI 出错的教训。
斯坦福校友做的记忆机制研究,用开卷考试讲清楚了神经记忆和文本记忆的区别,概念解释很直观。
OpenAI 用自家安全模型扫 Linux 内核,12 小时找出 2308 个候选漏洞,948 个能真提权,还不到半年前的 5 倍多,成本账也全公开了。
斯坦福团队把基准题加提示变简单,再反推模型真实成绩,算力省了 5600 倍还能预测 GSM8K,做评测和选型的人可以看看这套方法。
The framework shifts efficiency analysis from raw benchmark scores to value-per-joule, a metric that will matter as data-centre energy costs and grid constraints increasingly cap AI deployment. Teams choosing models or hardware can use it to justify smaller models like Gemma 4 31B over larger ones when value per joule outweighs per-task output. It pairs with GDPWorks for organisations benchmarking agentic work beyond the original 44 occupations.
Bacterial vaults are far simpler to study than their animal and plant counterparts, so finding them in simpler organisms gives structural biologists a faster path to testing what vaults actually do. The write-up is also candid about where Claude failed and how Anthropic's ML team fixed those errors, which is useful for anyone evaluating LLM-assisted science workflows. Life sciences researchers and AI practitioners assessing AI's role in hypothesis-driven work will get the clearest picture from the full piece.
Google Research 的新博客,讲的是 AI 怎么帮人把说不清的判断标准一点点磨出来,做 HCI 和内容审核的可以看看。
NVIDIA 实测发现让智能体频繁压缩历史几乎不掉分,Claude Opus 4.5 压缩后 SWE-bench 还高了 0.2 分,能省好几倍成本。
Nathan Lambert 写了一篇关于开源模型经济怎么测量的研究笔记,想搞清开源模型市场规模的人可以看看,不过要付费订阅才能读全文。
Turning papers into executable post-training environments is a concrete step toward models that improve themselves, and the benchmark parity with GLM-5.2 and GPT 5.5 shows the approach already competes with frontier results. Practitioners fine-tuning smaller open models can study the 281-task pipeline and trajectory filtering method to replicate the gains. The released Qwen-based checkpoints make the results directly testable.
UC San Diego 这篇论文说明长文本丢分不是长度问题,是相似但错误的语句抢走了注意力,RAG 场景该先去重。
Memory benchmarks so far test only storing and recalling facts, so unlearning failures have gone unmeasured; BEMULA gives that gap its first systematic yardstick. Teams building agents that retain user data should treat delete requests as an unverified UI state and engineer an explicit delete path with adversarial extraction tests. The paper is academic work with no regional availability angle, and its closest comparison is the memory features of mainstream agent frameworks rather than another benchmark.
搞运维或 Agent 的可以看看 CloudOpsBench,专门测 AI 能不能修服务、控权限这些真实云活儿,结论是推理还不行。
Google 出身的 Claude 工程师 Addy Osmani 写了份防「认知投降」手册,讲怎么用 AI 还不丢掉自己的思考,做 AI 产品的都该看看。
The non-obvious point is that when an AI agent scrapes or filters data, it silently makes coverage decisions that would normally require a human's judgement, so inherited bias compounds invisibly. Practitioners building RAG pipelines or training data collections in Southeast Asia can use the four-question checklist — population, prediction target, deployment shift, record definition — to audit datasets before use. The C4 versus FineWeb-Edu comparison shows swapping filters only changes what gets excluded, not exclusion itself.
Compacting aggressively changes the cost calculus for long-running agents: short state summaries can outperform full transcripts on both accuracy and spend, since late-token generation runs up to 7x pricier. Builders running multi-step coding or tool-use agents can test end-of-conversation compaction before paying for million-token runs. The gains were measured on Claude Opus 4.5, so teams using other frontier models should verify the effect on their own stacks.
The study shows agents moving beyond single-visit diagnosis into longitudinal disease management, where retrieval-grounded outputs matter most for clinical trust. Clinicians and medical AI teams working on ophthalmology or chronic care workflows can use it as a reference architecture for pairing multimodal patient data with evidence retrieval. It sits alongside medical agent work from groups like Microsoft and general clinical LLM benchmarks.
一篇有意思的论文:把视频扩散模型拿来学潜在动作,每帧压到 4 个 token,人类和机器人的动作能互相迁移,在 LARY-Bench 上拿了最优。
一篇文章把研究方向从'让机器更聪明'转向'让人的能力被放大',提出了认知共生体的完整设计框架,做 AI 产品方向的人可以看看。
Speculative decoding is usually tuned for speed, so the finding that acceptance choices can silently shift reasoning accuracy across long agent runs is a practical surprise. Developers building multi-step agents can adopt this training trick to improve reliability without touching the target model's weights or outputs. The parameter cost — under 0.3% — makes it feasible even for teams serving open-weight models.
让 Claude Opus 5.5 直接读神经网络权重、盲找放疗筛查网络的 bug,16/18 找中,还只改 3 个参数就修好,挺新鲜的做法。
医学物理计算出新基准了,1200 道题里 Claude 系列算得准但查错翻车,做医疗 AI 的可以看看自己模型的真实水平。
用编码智能体在仿真里批量造机器人训练数据,成绩反超遥操作真数据,一小时成本 107 美元,比中美两地人工都便宜,做具身智能的可以细看。
Only the latest 2000 items are listed; for older ones see the daily archive