Primary sourceAI Will
View sourceEvent ·Multi-source
Theo 分析110万次请求:$200 的 Claude Ultra 计划用 Opus 5.5 更划算
开发者 Theo(t3.gg)基于超过110万次真实 Anthropic API 请求做了成本测算:$200 的 Claude Ultra 订阅计划,一个月大约能用出价值 $15,000 的 Opus 5.5 用量,但同样额度只够约 $3,000 的 Fable 5.5。也就是说 Fable 每美元烧掉的额度比 Opus 更快。他推测一个原因是 Fable 更容易在单条提示词内完成任务,单次消耗反而更高。此外 Fable 还被限制在每周额度的 50% 以内,进一步压缩可用量。Theo 同时提醒,他近期有大量用量用于测试新模型,这一数据之后可能继续变化。
Current read
Theo 拿110万次真实 API 请求算了一笔账:$200 的 Claude Ultra 用 Opus 5.5 能换 $15,000 用量,Fable 5.5 只有 $3,000。对正在纠结订阅哪个档位的重度用户,这份真实消耗数据比官方宣传更有参考价值。
11 sources76° AI heatLast updated 2026/11/12 06:21:25
Evidence
11 sourcesRelated source 1宝玉
View sourceRelated source 2IT之家
View sourceRelated source 3Artificial Analysis
View sourceRelated source 4Claude
View sourceRelated source 5@koltregaskes
View sourceRelated source 6lmarena.ai
View sourceRelated source 7Latent Space (swyx)
View sourceRelated source 8Tech in Asia
View sourceRelated source 9TestingCatalog
View sourceRelated source 10kimmonismus
View sourceConflict check
Dedup data only shows that these sources discuss the same event, not that they agree. There is no structured supporting or refuting evidence yet, so no conflict is inferred automatically.