GLM-5.2 在前端任务上干掉了 Claude Opus 系列，对 Kimi 和 Sonnet 胜率超 60%，开源模型里相当能打。
GLM-5.2 (Max) 在 Code Arena: Frontend 排名第二，仅次于 Fable 5，但击败了 Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking) 和 Opus 4.7 (Thinking)。对 Kimi-K2.6 胜率 61.0%，对 Sonnet 4.6 胜率 59.4%，对 Opus 4.7 (Thinking) 胜率 55.0%。最接近的挑战来自 GPT-5.5 (xHigh)（41.7% vs 40.0%）和 Opus 4.6（47.0% vs 42.4%）。与前任 GLM-5.1 打成平手（45.5% - 45.5%）。在 Brand & Marketing、Data & Analytics 等多项子类别中排名第一。
How did GLM-5.2 (Max) get to the top of Code Arena: Frontend? Looking at matched head-to-head on rea...
How did GLM-5.2 (Max) get to the top of Code Arena: Frontend? Looking at matched head-to-head on real-world web dev frontend tasks, @Zai_org 's latest model takes a higher win share than its opponent in every pairing but one. - Beats every Claude Opus variant head-to-head: including Opus 4.8 (Thinking) and Opus 4.7 (Thinking) - Widest margins come against strong models: 61.0% vs Kimi-K2.6, 59.4% vs Sonnet 4.6 and 55.0% vs Opus 4.7 (Thinking). - The closest fight isn't from the very top: GPT-5.5 (xHigh), ranked #16 , pushes it hardest at 41.7% to 40.0%. Opus 4.6 is the other (47.0% to 42.4%). There is a generational nuance here. Versus its own predecessor GLM-5.1, the latest model is tied: 45.5% - 45.5%. The jump shows up against the field, the one pairing without a clear win is in a direct rematch with 5.1. Arena.ai @arena Exciting news: GLM-5.2 (Max) ranks #2 in Code Arena: Frontend, with +29pt over Claude Opus 4.7 (Thinking) and only behind Fable 5! GLM-5.2 is the best open model vs Kimi-K2.6 and Minimax-M3 by a large margin. - #2 React and #4 HTML sub-leaderboards - Ranks as the top model in nearly all sub categories: Brand & Marketing, Reference-Based Design, Data & Analytics, Consumer Product, Gaming, and Simulations. Congrats @Zai_org for the incredible milestone! 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 1 🔄 4 ❤️ 36 👀 5370 📊 5 ⚡