Fable 5写物理动画确实牛，但钱包要厚；GLM 5.2便宜到离谱，预算有限就选它。
Fable 5在三个HTML5物理演示场景中全部获得A+评级，消耗62158 tokens，成本3.12美元。GPT 5.5最接近Fable，消耗37753 tokens，成本1.14美元。Opus 4.8消耗22280 tokens，成本0.56美元。GLM 5.2最便宜，消耗36246 tokens，成本0.08美元，但未赢得任何场景。Fable是质量最佳选择，但成本是Opus 4.8的6倍。
源：https://t.co/L750ljtAsM
源： x.com/atomic_chat_hq… atomic.chat @atomic_chat_hq Fable 5 totally crushed our new contest, but it cost 6x more than Opus 4.8! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: — A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water — Two cars jumping off ramps and colliding mid-air over a canyon — A monster truck crushing a row of parked cars Outputs: Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08 Fable 5 did all three scenes at A+. The crashes looked real, things fell and broke the right way, and nothing went through the ground or floated. GPT 5.5 was the closest to Fable. In the Bigfoot show, we think GPT was even a little better. GLM 5.2 did not win any scene, but it was the cheapest by far. Fable is the best pick for quality, but you pay more for it. Your browser does not support the video tag. 🔗 View on Twitter 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 0 🔄 0 ❤️ 0 👀 382 ⚡