Sonnet 5 vs Fable 5 对比:生成3D地球HTML,成本差87%

源:https://t.co/TbOgDvSpap

精选理由

AI/ML API 实测了 Sonnet 5 和 Fable 5 做3D地球生成,Sonnet省87%钱但只有线框,Fable效果惊艳但贵。选模型前先看这对比。

AI 摘要

AI/ML API 对比了 Sonnet 5 和 Fable 5 在生成 3D 地球可视化 HTML 文件时的表现。两个模型使用相同提示词和真实航班数据集(70个机场、435条航线)。Sonnet 5 耗用 9.8k tokens,成本 $0.10,但只绘出暗线框和漂浮弧线,地球本身几乎不可见。Fable 5 耗用 15k tokens,成本 $0.77,生成带纹理海洋、冰盖和大气光的地球效果。Sonnet 5 成本低 87%,但视觉质量远不及 Fable 5。

原文 · AI Will

源:https://t.co/TbOgDvSpap

源: x.com/aimlapi/status… AI/ML API @aimlapi Fable 5 is BACK on AI/ML API We gave Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 the exact same prompt and same real flight dataset of 70 airports and 435 routes pulled from flightradar. Then asked each one to turn it into a cinematic 3D globe as a single HTML file. Outputs: Sonnet 5: 9.8k tokens, $0.10 Fable 5: 15k tokens, $0.77 Sonnet 5 came in 87% cheaper. It drew the routes, but the planet underneath them barely exists: a dark wireframe with the arcs floating in space. Fable 5 built an actual Earth: textured oceans, ice caps, atmospheric glow. Mythos-class models are truly a masterpiece. Docs, guides & setup below: Your browser does not support the video tag. 🔗 View on Twitter 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 0 🔄 0 ❤️ 0 👀 267 ⚡

Sonnet 5 vs Fable 5 对比:生成3D地球HTML,成本差87% · AI 热点