关于AGI与前部署工程师的矛盾叙事

Indeed: if we actually had AGI we would not need forward deployed engineers.

精选理由

两条AI叙事自相矛盾,一边说会用Claude就能干20人活,一边砸几十亿雇人帮你落地,值得琢磨。

AI 摘要

Hamel Husain指出当前AI领域存在两种矛盾叙事:一是认为AI已强大到一人可顶20人,只需学会使用Claude;二是公司投入数十亿美元雇佣前部署工程师帮助企业实施AI,因为自行操作仍耗时费力。作者更倾向第一种叙事,但认为两者相互矛盾。Gary Marcus评论称,若真有AGI,根本不需要前部署工程师。

原文 · Gary Marcus

Indeed: if we actually had AGI we would not need forward deployed engineers.

Indeed: if we actually had AGI we would not need forward deployed engineers. Hamel Husain @HamelHusain Two simultaneous AI narratives right now: 1) You can now do the work of 20 people, learn anything and create anything with AI. Just learn how to use claude. 2) We are investing Billions in forward deployed engineers to help you implement AI b/c its too time consuming and hard for you to do it yourself. I skew more towards #1 , fwiw. But I find these narratives to be incongruent. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 1 🔄 0 ❤️ 12 👀 1216 📊 2 ⚡