Rauchg指出了AGI概念的局限，强调AI虽强但写不出有灵魂的文字。和主流观点不一样，值得看看他的角度。
Guillermo Rauch发帖称AGI一词已严重过时，AI在大多数经济相关任务上表现优于人类智能。但他指出AI无法像人类那样本能地关心他人，即使使用200个技能和50个子代理生成文字，结果仍像机器人。他呼吁保持人性优先，认为AI可替代任务但不能替代独特的个体。
The term "AGI" has aged very poorly. AI can't possibly me more different from human intelligence. It...
The term "AGI" has aged very poorly. AI can't possibly me more different from human intelligence. It's *far better* than human intelligence, for most economically-relevant tasks. But that doesn't make AIs better than humanity. There are wonderful things humans can do that these superintelligences (the better term) can't. For one, we care-for and care-about other humans in a powerful and inherent way, that we then teach machines to emulate. We must keep that as the top priority in everything we do. We have to be as pro-human-life as it gets. AIs can replace tasks you do, but they can't replace the proverbial you. This is why they horribly suck at writing! Even when given a corpus of your writing and 200 Skills and 50 subagents running in gRaPh LoOps, they produce robotic prose… because they are robots. I know one definitive way that people can become irrelevant. They stop being themselves: lose their identity, delegate all their writing, their unique thoughts, the creative ways in which they can use the machines. Opting out of 'weighing in'. I think we're safe though. There's nothing more distasteful right now than AI replies in social media or (🟢 T H I S T H I N G ) in landing pages. Quality and humanity will prevail. 💬 36 🔄 12 ❤️ 169 👀 11034 📊 51 ⚡