别直接问Claude Opus 5问题，试试搭个Agent工作流，效果能比Fable还好。
推文指出大多数用户直接使用Claude Opus 5效果差，速度慢且输出一般。正确做法是构建包含循环、图、审查器、编排器和并行Agent的工作流。一个地铁跑酷游戏示例用了超过3小时，但输出质量超越了Fable 5。在复杂Agent协作下，首个Claude计划仍有大量剩余用量。
10. 大多数人使用 Claude Opus 5 的方式都不对 正确的 Agent 工作流可以超越 Fable。 https://t.co/lnWReOuCsH
10. 大多数人使用 Claude Opus 5 的方式都不对 正确的 Agent 工作流可以超越 Fable。 x.com/_MaxBlade/stat… Max Blade @_MaxBlade holy opus 5... 🤯 At first I was VERY disapointed, the model is ridiculously slow and the output was not impressive. i was using it WRONG. fable 5 can take a shit prompt and give you gold, but it will also burn all your tokens. opus is the opposite. use loops, graphs, reviewers, orchestrators, and agents working in parallel. ( this subway surfers game took over 3 hours ) Your output will be 10x better. The crazy part is, even with all these agents working together I have PLENTY of usage left on my first claude plan. The skill ceiling is insanely high, if you put time into a good agentic engineering strategy you can achieve BETTER output than fable. Opus 5 is a true daily driver. Your browser does not support the video tag. 🔗 View on Twitter 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 0 🔄 0 ❤️ 0 👀 280 ⚡