FlightLLM:基于先验引导的语义LLM解释飞行安全事件

Can Large Language Models Explain Flight Safety Events? A Prior-Guided Semantic LLM-based Approach

精选理由

FlightLLM用LLM解释飞行事故原因,比传统方法更直观,还能直接给出可操作的安全建议。

AI 摘要

研究人员提出FlightLLM方法,结合先验引导的语义LLM技术分析飞行安全事件。该方法在704个A320航班样本上测试,针对硬着陆风险事件实现了具有竞争力的分类性能。通过特征工程和语义离散化模块,将飞行数据转化为定性描述;引入CatBoost作为统计专家提供先验指导,并采用对比少样本学习策略弥补数据不足。

原文 · arXiv cs.AI

Can Large Language Models Explain Flight Safety Events? A Prior-Guided Semantic LLM-based Approach

Improving flight safety with flight data requires not only accurate detection of risk events, but more importantly, clear interpretation of their underlying causes at the level of pilot control behavior. Existing explainable AI techniques, such as feature importance maps, often require considerable domain knowledge to translate them into operationally meaningful explanations. Large Language Models (LLMs), which excel at language reasoning, bring a promising solution to this issue. However, applying LLMs in this domain presents key challenges such as modal inconsistency, limited classification ability, scarcity of task-specific data for fine-tuning, and lack of domain knowledge. To overcome these challenges, we propose FlightLLM, a prior-guided semantic LLM-based approach for interpretable flight safety analysis. Specifically, we first perform feature engineering to address modal inconsistency, combining statistical descriptors with physically meaningful flight indicators. This representation is further processed by a Semantic Discretization module, which converts abstract numerical patterns into qualitative descriptions that are more compatible with language reasoning. In addition, since LLMs are not inherently strong classifiers, CatBoost is incorporated as a statistical expert, and its prediction results are injected into the prompt as prior guidance. A contrastive few-shot learning strategy is further adopted to compensate for limited data. Finally, we design structured prompts to embed aviation-specific knowledge into the inference process. Using hard landing, a representative risk event with complex causal mechanisms, as an anchor point, we evaluate FlightLLM on a dataset of 704 real-world A320 flight samples. Experimental results show that the proposed approach achieves competitive classification performance while generating direct and reasonable explanations for event causes.