精选理由
有人实测了Fable 5.1与8个主流模型的表现，看看它是否真的更值得用。
Peter Gostev将Fable 5.1与Anthropic最新模型、Opus 5、GPT-5.6、Kimi K3、GLM 5.3、Qwen-3.8、Grok-4.6和DeepSeek进行了对比测试。测试涵盖编程、3D、SVG、研究和数据可视化五大任务。各模型生成成本从几美元到65美元以上不等。Fable 5.1在质量与价格平衡方面表现突出。
原文 · lmarena.ai
Is Fable 5.1 actually better? @petergostev just put @AnthropicAI's latest model head-to-head with Fa...
Is Fable 5.1 actually better? @petergostev just put @AnthropicAI 's latest model head-to-head with Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, Qwen-3.8, Grok-4.6, and DeepSeek across coding, 3D, SVG, research, and data-viz tasks. With costs ranging from cents to $65+ per generation, see how Fable 5.1 stacks up to others when it comes to quality vs. price. youtube.com/watch?v=67M02C… 💬 6 🔄 1 ❤️ 46 👀 6367 📊 12 ⚡