研究对比多种预训练CNN模型用于黑色素瘤检测
A Comparative Evaluation of Pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Detection
这是篇研究论文,对比了多种预训练模型在黑色素瘤检测任务上的表现,对想了解不同模型适用性的研究者可能有参考价值。
本研究评估了ResNet50、VGG16等5种预训练CNN架构在皮肤镜图像和病理切片图像上的表现。在皮肤镜图像数据集HAM10000上,ResNet50准确率最高达84%;在病理切片数据集CR-AI4SkIN上,ResNet50准确率也最高达83%。结果显示不同架构在不同图像类型上的表现差异显著。
A Comparative Evaluation of Pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Detection
Early diagnosis of melanoma is critical for improving patient survival rates. However, accurately distinguishing melanoma from other skin lesions remains a significant clinical challenge due to the high visual similarity among lesion types and variability in image acquisition conditions. Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning, has emerged as a promising tool to support dermatological diagnosis by automating feature extraction from medical images. Among the available approaches, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated strong performance in image classification tasks, making them well-suited for analyzing both dermatoscopic and histopathological images, given their ability to capture hierarchical visual patterns relevant to lesion characterization. Nevertheless, despite numerous pre-trained CNN architectures having been proposed, selecting the most appropriate one for a given imaging modality remains an open challenge. In this study, we evaluate pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for skin lesion classification using dermatoscopic and histopathological image datasets. Experiments were conducted on the HAM10000, ISIC 2018, and CR-AI4SkIN datasets, evaluating the ResNet50, VGG16, VGG19, MobileNet, and InceptionV3 architectures under the same training protocol. The experimental evaluation showed that the models achieved accuracies ranging from 71% (InceptionV3 on ISIC 2018) to 84% (ResNet50 on HAM10000) on dermatoscopic images. For histopathological images, accuracies ranged from 72% (VGG19) to 83% (ResNet50) on the CR-AI4SkIN dataset. The results demonstrate that model performance differs between dermatoscopic and histopathological image modalities, showing that architectures exhibiting similar performance on dermatoscopic images exhibit different performance on histopathological data.