AI 硬件正在模糊“录音”的法律定义
We can’t just change the definition of ‘recording’
精选理由
这篇 The Verge 的评论讨论 AI 眼镜厂商靠“只处理不存储”的说法绕开录音法，读完再决定要不要买这类设备。
The Verge 撰文指出，AI 硬件厂商正试图重新界定什么才算“录音”。传统设备有麦克风或摄像头时，录音与非录音之间界限清晰，要么开要么关。而 AI 眼镜、AI Pin 等新品宣称音频只用于实时处理、不被存储，从而绕开现有录音法规。文章质疑这种“不算录音”的说法，认为麦克风 capturing 声音本身就构成录音。
原文 · theverge
We can’t just change the definition of ‘recording’
With AI hardware, tech companies are pushing the definition of what does and doesn't constitute a recording. For most of gadget history, it'd be reasonable to assume that a device with a microphone or camera is either recording you or it isn't; it's either on or off, without much gray area. Microphones capture sound. Cameras […]
