Anthropic 称已将 Claude 遭蒸馏攻击窃取的数据减少约 90-99%
Anthropic 把 Claude 被蒸馏偷走的数据砍掉了 90-99%，David Sacks 借此说：技术问题让公司自己解决，别动不动找华盛顿立法规。
Anthropic 宣布通过技术防御，将从 Claude 中被蒸馏提取的数据量降低了约 90-99%。美国 AI 与加密事务负责人 David Sacks 对此表示认可，并重申他此前在 All-In 第 282 期播客中的观点：阻止蒸馏应由 Anthropic 自身而非政府完成。此前华盛顿曾有人推动以知识产权为由限制开源模型，Nvidia、Microsoft、Meta、IBM 等 50 家公司联名公开信反对，近 200 家初创公司也发出类似信件。Sacks 认为此次结果证明技术防御有效，不必为每个技术难题寻求新的监管。
Anthropic says it has reduced the data harvested from Claude in distillation attacks by around 90–99%. I congratulate them on this achievement.
It’s consistent with the point I made a few months ago (All-In Ep. 282): Anthropic, not the government, was in the best position to stop distillation of its own models. Once the horse is out of the barn, there’s limited value in after-the-fact government action.
At the time there was a major push in Washington to restrict open models on IP grounds. The threat looked serious enough that 50 companies — including Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta, IBM, Palantir, and Dell — published an open letter in defense of open-weight models. Jensen Huang promoted it in his first-ever X post. Nearly 200 startups sent a similar letter.
I argued that restricting open models risked removing the incentive for closed-model companies to solve the problem themselves — and could reward negligence by stifling competition while they continued collecting revenue from distillation. The administration did not impose those restrictions.
Now we see the result. Anthropic invested in defenses and they worked. Not every technical challenge is a reason to run to Washington for new regulation.
