想用 AI 做游戏开发的团队，这个对比直接告诉你：省钱不一定省心——Deepseek 便宜但质量差一截，GPT-5.5 贵但成品更靠谱，建议根据预算和品质要求选模型。
在游戏开发竞赛中，Deepseek V4 Pro 与 GPT-5.5 被要求制作卡丁车游戏。GPT-5.5 以 0.33 美元成本、25 tok/s 速度生成 10,580 tokens，耗时 7 分钟，最终游戏质量、视觉效果和创意方向明显更优。Deepseek V4 Pro 成本仅 0.07656 美元，便宜 4.3 倍，生成 18,869 tokens（近 2 倍），但游戏在图形、视觉打磨和创意执行上较弱。结论是尽管 Deepseek 定位为强编码模型，在游戏开发测试中仍远落后于 GPT-5.5。
Deepseek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.5 in a gamedev contest (f…
Deepseek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.5 in a gamedev contest (full prompt is below)🏎️
Cost: Deepseek V4 Pro: $0.07656 GPT-5.5: $0.33063
Output stats: Deepseek: 34 tok/s · 9m 5s · 18,869 tokens GPT-5.5: 25 tok/s · 7m 5s · 10,580 tokens
Conclusion: GPT-5.5 clearly made the better karting game. Deepseek V4 Pro was 4.3x cheaper and generated almost 2x more tokens, but the final result was weaker. It struggled with graphics, visual polish, and creative direction, while GPT-5.5 delivered better game quality, better visuals, more creativity, and stronger overall execution. Even though Deepseek positions itself as a strong model for coding, in this gamedev test it still felt far behind GPT-5.5.
Try the same karting prompt with another AI model and share your result below.