Papers

论文提出 grasp 概念:以固定信息量衡量跨工作预算的表现

From Grind to Grasp

Why we picked it

一篇挺有意思的理论论文,把“聪明”拆成信息和工作两个维度,还顺带论证了为什么该警惕智能体社会自己掌权。

arXiv 论文 2610.38728 引入一个形式化框架,区分算法复杂度与计算深度,提出 work-bounded complexity 概念来比较在不同工作与信息限制下的成就。作者定义 grasp 为固定信息配额下跨工作预算的表现,低 grasp 的系统可以靠 grind(高工作成本)达成目标但不会提升人类 grasp。论文还将 grasp 应用于递归自我改进的判据:后继系统能以更少工作完成同等改进。作者据此警示,智能体集体的组织性工作可能催生维持集体自身的目标,不应让涌现的智能体社会主导社会协调。

Original · arXiv cs.AI

From Grind to Grasp

Discussions of complexity, knowledge and intelligence often overlook the work involved. For example, outputs generated by short programs have low algorithmic complexity but can have high computational depth, the least work needed to produce them from near-shortest programs. Producing them with less work can require longer descriptions, giving high work-bounded complexity. We introduce a formalism that compares achievements under work and information limits and describes how learning and persistence can make deep achievements shallow by reusing products of earlier work. For an agent with a limited work budget, the value of building and maintaining such resources depends on how they support its goals over later tasks. We define grasp as performance across work budgets at a fixed information allowance. Low grasp can still yield success through grind at high cost in work, without necessarily improving human grasp. Applied to improvement itself, grasp gives a criterion for recursive self-improvement in which successors make comparable further improvements more efficiently. Another route to faster progress is to expand the resources brought to bear through knowledge sharing and coordination across society, even while comparable advances require increasing work. Grasp also applies to collectives, which may outperform their members yet require more total work than one system with their combined resources. Establishing and sustaining organisation can itself be deep even when the primary task is simple. These demands may help explain the richness of biological and social systems. In agent collectives, this organisational work can generate goals beyond assigned tasks, including maintaining the collective itself. We therefore caution against allowing an emergent agent society to assume authority over social coordination, since it could increasingly direct work towards its own persistence and goals.