Google 研究：AI 队友会“顶嘴”，学生写的商业计划书反而更好
Google 拿 Gemini 3.1 Pro 做了个会跟学生抬杠的 AI 队友，试验里比普通 AI 工具帮学生多拿了 7 分，做教育产品的可以看看。
Google Research 在 Vantage 平台上让学生与由 Gemini 3.1 Pro 驱动的 AI 队友对话练习商业任务，这些队友会提有缺陷的点子、表达异议并说错话，但不代替学生完成任务。在 52 名学生的试验中，Vantage 组最终商业计划书平均得分 67.6%，使用普通 AI 工具的对照组为 60.5%。完成 5 到 6 个练习任务的学生平均得分 79.7%，没做过练习的只有 59.3%。
New Google paper finds that students who practiced with AI teammates that push back wrote better business plans than students using normal AI tools.
Skills like critical thinking and collaboration matter for starting a business, but they are hard to teach and hard to practice at scale.
They extended Vantage, a Google Research platform where students solve business tasks in chat with AI teammates run by Gemini 3.1 Pro. The teammates pitch flawed ideas, disagree, and state false claims, but never do the task for the student.
In a trial with 52 students, the Vantage group averaged 67.6% on the final business plan, versus 60.5% for controls using standard AI tools. Students who did 5 to 6 practice tasks averaged 79.7%, while those who did none scored 59.3%.
If you build AI for learning, make it a teammate that challenges people, not an assistant that finishes their work.
